Rocket Challenge on Discover

After seeing the ad for the rocket challenge on Discover I had a thought...
If you were an average American with 2.5 children and a dog and absolutely
no knowledge of amateur rocketry, would seeing a three hour show about 65+
pound rockets being sent 10,000+ feet into the sky make you feel comfortable
about this hobby?
Perhaps the reality is that the very things that make this hobby attractive
to many of us make it unattractive to many others.
I am not trolling here, it's just that in terms of attracting new hobbyists,
this show may be just a little bit overwhelming.
Before the flaming begins, I am against neither the concept or the focus of
the show--my vcr is set.
All I am saying is try (try) to think about this from the point of view of
someone who has never been exposed to this, then suddenly sees something
that looks and sounds (to them) like a NASA project blasting off from a
just a thought, now bring the bitterness...
Reply to
Loading thread data ...
I AM an average American...(I'm a Vet)...with 2.5 children and a dog, and prior to my first launch, had absolutely no knowledge of amateur rocketry. I am afraid of the B.S. that the government is trying to FORCE down my throat! Other than the 'elected' and the 'Holier than Though' idiots in the upper echelons of our government, anyone involved in our hobby knows that when the RULES are followed, Amateur Rocketry is SAFER than the nonsense that goes on during our annual 4th of July 'celebration'.
How many times since it's been available has the NAR or TRIPOLI's insurance been used?!?!?!
And why in the world is black powder, although MORE dangerous than AP, easier to get...AND larger quantities?!?!?!
Because the general public has NO idea how silly this hobby is. That's why. When I say 'silly', that's exactly what I mean.
Take into consideration that the majority of us have started with nothing more than a cardboard tube, and a lot have now 'graduated' to more technical materials, ie carbon fiber, Kevlar, etc etc...just to do the same thing!!!
Build an ENTIRELY harmless 'tube', (or outhouse, or orange barrel, or WHATEVER), just to launch it as high as possible, get it back, and DO IT AGAIN!!!
The fire danger is common sense, in that most would not even CONSIDER launching without proper precautions or if conditions were severe. The damage danger is also common sense, if the RULES are followed, even with a catastrophic event, the chance of someone, or someone's property, getting hurt/damaged are more slim than my drive to work every morning.
The thing I find the most interesting is that the same people that want to 'regulate' AP are the same people that can't even regulate their own national spending, and yet vote themselves a blinkin' raise every year.
So, in MY opinion, yes, this needs to be shown to the general public. How many of 'us' LOVE the 4th of July, not for the bang and spark, but just for throwing something up in the air to defy gravity, or to see who can go highest? And if a person can then recover and re-use, what a thrill!!!!
I have to agree that from the previews I've seen, and not the entire show, that maybe it's a little too extreme... but if we can show the general population that what we do is SAFE, even with mistakes, problems, and un-expected results, that MAYBE we can then get that same general population to realize that we just wanna have fun!!!
So, with every average Joe that sees the result of our efforts, whether they be safe-n-sane, or a total mishap and yet safe, that is one more person that MIGHT be turned on to our hobby, and if not, at least understand that even with the 'Tryin' to catch NASA' mentality that some of us seem to have, this is NOTHING more than Big Boys with Big Toys, and that world peace is NOT in peril from anything we do!
Ok, that's my two cents, now let's go launch rockets!!
Reply to
Thomas Parson
I hate it when I can't spell my own name.........
Reply to
Chuck Rudy
Hmmm... but doesn't that sort of thing have a certain appeal? I mean they have various "robot wars" and similar things...
-dave w
Reply to
David Weinshenker
To be honest, when I first found out what high power rockets were capable of, my first thought was "cool!", followed quickly by "Okay, what do I have to do to try this out?"
I've been involved ever since.
My wife even likes high power (she's L1), and my kids think some of the big projects are cool.
Reply to
Kevin Trojanowski
Maybe my point of view is tainted. I think the shows are a good deal. I was introduced to high power by the same show you were speaking of. I was jumping up and down pointing at the TV and yelling to the wife "Did you SEE that!!!" After flying Estes-class stuff since the 5th grade, it seemed too good to be true.
They showed the big-ass Redstone that Tripoli Nebraska built. I was not only astonished at the size of the thing, but guys from my home state had built it! Wow! I didn't have a computer at the time, but high power rocketry was one of the first things I looked up when I got one.
I think this series of shows on Discovery has the potential to bring in lots of new blood, the last shows brought me in, and a few others I would suspect. :-)
-- Joe Michel NAR 82797 L1
Reply to
J.A. Michel
...not to mention that the descriptions of the three shows refer to "Mach 2", "16 pound bowling balls" (i.e. payload) launched from a rocket "built in just a matter of hours", and "target based competitions". Sounds like a great holiday gift for the fear-mongers. Maybe the BATFE doesn't need their own video.
As for the point of view of someone who has never been exposed, I use the reaction of non-rocketeers hearing about my Level 3 as a gauge. More often than not, people are surprised that something so large, fast, and heavy is allowed to fly -- especially to such high altitudes. Show them a picture of the launch rail at 45 degrees (on its way to vertical, of course) and some people go pale.
Personally, I think that the rocketry community would be best served by dropping the argument that the technologies that we use are not suitable for destructive purposes. Better to acknowledge the potential and focus on our self-regulation and safety record.
Reply to
Jim Meyers
well, have you even considered the mental anguish you're inflicting on all the other Chucks?
Where's my lawyer?...
Reply to
Chuck Stewart
If you like left your real name you would not be trolling. Anonymous posting is trolling.
Reply to
Greg Cisko
Er... _any_ technology can be used for destructive purposes. I think you've let the thundering roar of your level 3 go to your head... ;) Your car has vastly greater energy resources.
Two points:
1) Hobby rockets are not equivalent to military rockets, and do not come anywhere near most military rocket requirements. The numbers are not ing up.
2) Hobby rockets are so much not a threat that the BATF and friends felt it neccesary to LIE about their capabilities in order to try to get their rules passed... and you want to give in to this outright deception? When you begin relying on rocketry's safety record that's when the BATF will begin lying about that as well.
Reply to
Chuck Stewart
My reaction is more like; Cool, I can't beleive our ^&*%# goverment lets us do this.
Amen Brother Jim. Well, I'm still L0, but we're all in this together.
Reply to
Alan Jones
"NaCl" wrote in news:ha_qb.1808$
Reply to
David W.
What WOULD make me comfortable is seeing them do something like the bowling ball loft. You might have a point if all that was shown were a bunch a big rockets going off, especially military scale as John Q. already relates rockets to weapons. But doing something with them; BB loft, altitude records, TARC, etc, shows that the people doing it understand the rockets and technology to the point of even attempting something like a BB loft. It demonstrates that the technology is established and "controllable" and the participants know what they are doing, if you get my meaning.
No doubt, it will freak some people out; politicians, BATFE agents, etc. But, I think, the majority will be curious and amazed; the typical response of newbies to an HPR launch.
Reply to
Oh my, I'm gonna be in so much trouble here, but I agree with NaCl. Ok, now Kevin T. is going to probably come over to my house and beat me for this, but....... By and large the people involved in rocketry tend to be a certain type of person: curious, pretty smart, relatively well employed, pretty well informed, and generally independent. By extension, these people tend to hang out and work with people that are (for the most part) like them. That said, most of the population is not like that, they tend to be: narrow minded, barely educated, informed only by the mass media and "Uncle Charlie". They also think the government knows what is best for them and mainly are standing with their hand out waiting for the government to put something in it. You have to admit, this latter group is going to be intimidated by this show and if the next day the ATFE uses parts of it to say "See, we told you so!" they will rise up and say "Amen brother, ban those guys!". It doesn't have to make sense, this is the same group of people who still think O.J. is innocent. Now, I'm pleased and excited that the program is going to be on. Generally the people watching it are going to be people like us, as the other group of people will be watching the "Simpson's" or something equally banal instead of the "Discovery Channel". But, I still feel it could come back to bite us if portions of it are used in conjunction with the ATFE footage of actually hitting a target with a rocket. (You know they will succeed: unlimited funds, forget the science, or any semblance of reality, and eventually you will get that "Golden BB") Ok, let the flames begin!
Kevin (wearing my nomex) Rich Tripoli Lvl 2, FAA Senior Rigger, "Stumpy" Recovery Dude
Reply to
Kevin Rich
How did you feel about tattooed bikers and cycle builders before Motorcycle Mania?
I know they came off more 'human' and 'artisan' in my mind after the show....
Let's wait for Sunday night and see how the web hits add up.
We gonna have a hit count pool?
Joel. phx
Reply to
Joel Corwith
Yes the public sees rockets and missiles as 1 of 2 things: weapons of semi mass destruction(depending on what its warhead is) and space vehicles.... this show hopefully will show a 3rd use: as a hobby/sport..... I would have preferred the NAR creating this show for this pasts years TARC event, or future TARC event, but then the NAR couldn't market its way out of a wet paper bag......
shockie B)
Reply to
So true.
Reply to
Jerry Irvine
Try to think of a society where we are not entitled to try.
"Those Wright Brothers are doin' sumthin' strange. It's not right and it's not normal. There ought to be somebody watchin' 'em to make sure they don't try sumthin' that I might not understand. I heerd it had sumthin' to do with flyin' and that's just not right. Horses are fine and I can even tolerate those aut-o-mobiles, but we don't need no people droppin' out of the sky, fallin' on mah head or anything like that! It's jest naht right. People oughtn't to be able to do anything they please. We need laws to confine society to my limited views, so that I can feel safe."
"Now iffin it wuz a buziness entity, rather than individuals, I might understand. Buzinesses should be allowed to do anything they want. That's what America's all about. But people, you gotta watch them, they can't be trusted. Individual's rights and freedoms, can only lead to trouble. I guarantee it!"
It would be unfortunate if our society has slipped to the point of viewing the extraodinary as a threat, rather than an accomplishment. Fear, out of ignorance (lack of knowledge on a given subject) is prejudice.
Whether that sense of accomplishment is found in an Estes BT-50 sized rocket (and there are people who are afraid of these as well) or a 65 lb. rocket should be left to the individual and not influenced by people who don't understand.
If we live in a society where sufficient, adequate or good enough is decided by the masses, we might simply define one type car, one sized house, fixed income, you name it, is sufficient and progress comes to a halt. Limited vision produces limited results.
Fox News and talk radio scare me more than anything.
Reply to
How did people feel the first time they saw a tire fly into a grandstand full of people at 200mph at a racetrack?
If it's done properly (as opposed to "Check out these lunatics and their insane hobby!"), TV exposure can help bring the hobby into the mainstream. Just the fact that it is on TV will make it seem less bizarre and more like a real sport. Look at BattleBots -- before the TV show, that was an obscure hobby for tech freaks and geeks in the eyes of Joe Average. Now they see Boy Scouts and families doing it on TV and having fun, and suddenly it's mainstream.
Reply to
Why not, since it's true?
The people trying to regulate us out of existence don't give a damn about that. They never have and never will.
Reply to

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.