Need a break from reviewing my latest tech article. Let's see how things are going on RMR.
Humm... Not so good....
Jerry Irv> >
Unfortunately with you trashing things here, many people have moved on to other newsgroups. In particular, many of the technical people have moved on. The way this Tech thread got trashed, I can see why.
This unfortunately makes my job more difficult, because now I'll be having to post technical results to 4 or 5 different newsgroups, instead of one. The technical community here has really splintered. Oh well. Thank you Jerry.
If these Tech thread discussions turn into a waste of time like the last one, I'll just do (1); announce that the tech article is out, and here's the HPR issue to find it in.
By your third post you were making personal attacks, which by the way had nothing to do with nozzle thrust coefficients.
Great example right in your last post. "...taken to excess WRT issues raised regarding rules, regs, ethics, and policies" has nothing to do with nozzle thrust coefficients. Start another Tripoli attack thread, don't pollute a Tech thread with this garbage.
It doesn't hurt me. It hurts the thread. And wastes my time and everyone else's time by trashing the thread.
I'm getting it now. The best self-editing is just "ignore Jerry".
I'm not going to bother looking up and posting here your numerous "I invented High Power Rocketry" posts. "I invented High Power Rocketry" is a pretty broad statement, sure sounds like to me "I invented [everything in] High Power Rocketry".
Check my third post, a little nozzle survey I did checking out your motors on your web site. Clearly not the majority with L/D's = 0.30. You took my information, and regurgitated it back to me.
Which you're right, I should ignore. Good advice.
CONSUMER
Another great example right in your last post, more Tripoli attacks, blah, blah, blah. What does this have to do with nozzle thrust coefficients?
Well I've figured this out too. Publish or perish. I'll publish. Jerry perish? :)
If next time you claim, "I've been doing this for years, but it was proprietary, yada, yada, yada", ya know, publish it, with real data, or sit down and shut up.
Keep exit plane in same location. Keep convergent in the same location. Shorten up straight-cut throat L/D by rounding the throat entrance. Recommended rounding radius is in the tech article.
There's a concept; buy the tech article, and actually read it!
Well, I'll come and go here when I can afford to waste the time, I guess. In fact on many of these RMR arguments all you've really proved Jerry is that you have more time to waste at this than I do.
So in other words, I should ignore you? Good advice. I'll take your advice.
In fact I'm wasting my time with these very key strokes. But, not for long. I've got to look up blast tube data for another thread. You know, something useful.
So why did you even participate in this thread? Jeez. Chuck Rogers snipped-for-privacy@aol.com