Why Does Posting About BP Rocketry Feel "OT"?

Jun 22, 2004 26 Replies

True, it is pretty entertaining from a distance - how about RMR the movie?

90 minutes of repetitive pointless arguments, someone launches a rocket, 30 minutes flaming the guy who launched the rocket, the end.....

Someday when we are 60, rmr the movie might just happen.

A little different then that however.

more like someone launches a rocket, and police get called for garage looters getting motor equipment unanounced.

someone gets an altitude record, and waivers are half the record.

stuff like that.

True

Also true

Is this a quote from one of the owners or moderators?

That site goes down more than a Times Square hooker

All this having been said. I find it to be a good site and serving a public interest well. Better than ROL in many ways.

So I offered them free storage, bandwidth and a "transmitter free" experience. Despite their spiteful words to me. Someone has to (should) rise above the crap first.

Jerry

Not at all. All the Estes motors are BP based. And the Quest motors too. Between them, they make up the vast majority of model rocket flights.

On the other hand, while the number of "big composite" and hybrid motors has been good up (kosdon, aerotech, Cessaroni, Propulsion polymers, Ellis, hypertek, rattworks...), the number of BP motor manufacturers has gone down (no more FSI, apogee, or Rocketflite BP motors.) Fact is, composite motors are safer to make, have somewhat less regulatory issues, and higher performance. Furthermore, bigger is easier, and more profitable, especially if you can charge proportional to fuel weight when the major costs are NOT propellant costs.

And Estes motors have gotten expensive (relative to their old price) too...

BillW

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required