Academy 1/48 F-16C Block 25/32 Viper Review

The its true; you are a disturbed man... 8-D

I read most, if not all the books years ago, but nothing was ever stated catagorically as to speeds or distances. In addition to that, the other crap (Yah-rons, Cent-ons, etc, and calling solar systems galaxies) made technical data pretty hard to follow. At least Star Trek tries to make things understandable.

-- John The history of things that didn't happen has never been written. . - - - Henry Kissinger

Reply to
The Old Timer
Loading thread data ...

re: Patrick Stewart. In Roger Ebert's review of Star Trek:Nemesis, he remarked that "many people say that Patrick Stewart is capable of delvering even the worst lines with absolute conviction.

I say we should stop encouraging him!"

Heh.

I became VERY disenchanted with ENT after Bannon/Braga/Buttheads decided the throw in that moronic "time traveller cold war" crap. But then, I gave up quickly on Voyager as well, right after someone said "why does this show remind me of Lost in Space?...." Yep. That's it! :)

I never was thrilled with the D myself, but have become acclimated. At least the popularity of the show allowed modelers to finally settle on a COMMON SCALE. Heh.1/1400 it is, then!

Of course, now we have Polar Lights stirring things up with their

1/1000 series. At least my B will be in scale with something else...

I do like the Voyager design, and the E has (finally) stopped the "bigger is better" creep. I think it's actually smaller tonnage than the D.

It's not too hard to find E images all 'round the web. Check it out, you might like it. ;)

Reply to
Casey Tompkins

I liked the description of DS9 comparing it to Magical Mystery Tour, put a bunch of musicians on a bus, have tehm drive around the English country side and film what happens. Let's put a space station by a wormhole and film what happens. At least DS9 evolved into something interesting at times as it went along.

Reply to
SMarsh3807

Deep Snore 9 was nothing but a total and lame ripoff of the Best Sci-Fi to ever air on t.v. ...

Babylon 5

Reply to
starlord

Talk to James Garner about Glen Larson sometime. The Bubonic Plagiarist, who never had a good idea until someone else had it first.

Reply to
Tom Cervo

i've heard it was because the show had a few weeks to get into production and then had no scripts ready for advance shows plus the network wanted changes every week.

Reply to
e

larson was like the rest at that time. and some still are.

Reply to
e

Your close, there where a few other resons too. Being stationed with my cab in Hollywood I got to take to a lot of the behind the shows people.

Reply to
starlord

i've heard other reasons...mostly dirty money.

Reply to
e

the new bsg is miles above enterprise. and kicking it's ass in the ratings with 1/4 the audience.

Reply to
e

Personally, I found DS9 to be more relevant in describing former underground fighters who have to rebuild a country. I enjoyed all the political maneuvring between Klingons, Romulans, Cardassians and the Dominion. That exercise last year on Enterprise was so worthless that none of it was taped here and I have almost every ST show on a cassette.

BSG was good fun and a big step ahead of "Buck Rogers" but I don't rank it generally near Trek.

Bill Banaszak, MFE

Reply to
Mad-Modeller

And the DS9 people are now making BSG.

Reply to
Tom Cervo

Mad-Modeller wrote: : : BSG was good fun and a big step ahead of "Buck Rogers" but I don't rank : it generally near Trek. : Like Hell! BSG had NOTHING to compate to Erin Gray. Col. Wilma Deering in a slinky jumpsuit, in a mini. Of course, it wasn't so neat the last season, when she was in a dress proper. Not to mention the highly annoying robot. Creighton, perhaps?

For that matter, BSG was hard pressed to match Pamela Hensley.

Bruce

Reply to
Bruce Burden

Reply to
M Bryant
Reply to
Digital_Cowboy

I never tried lighting the kit, but I did pick up the cockpit and seated Colonial Viper pilot. Really nice detail. I haven't used the set yet, I was waiting for the landing gear set, but have been too cheap or lazy to pick it up. Rob Gronovius Modern US armor at

formatting link

Reply to
Rob Gronovius

Speaking of Pamela, whatever happened to her?? After a short stint on that detective show with what's his name she seems to have disappeared. Did she marry a millionaire stock broker or what?

Bill Shuey

Reply to
William H. Shuey

formatting link
Apparently she hasn't appeared in anything since 1984.

Reply to
Enzo Matrix

Casey Tompkins wrote: : Dunno; a couple of the BSG chicks could keep up with Erin, I think. : Ok, the mini gives her a small edge. : Really? I don't remember any female in the original BSG series, and given that I was in high school at that time, says a lot.

I am not sure what I think about the female second to Apollo on the new series. I like the series, and I have liked EJO since his role in "Blade Runner".

But, actresses in BSG? Nope. Which is to say, yes, I remember there were some, but none stand out 30 years later. Then again, they weren't in minis either. :-)

Bruce

Reply to
Bruce Burden

You don't remember Jane Seymour? Tch, tch, tch.

Bill Banaszak, MFE

Reply to
Mad-Modeller

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.