Probably sooner, and we probably wouldn't even have had to go in on the ground. It was true *strategic* bombing that finally convinced the N. Vietnamese to participate in serious peace talks, and even then Kissinger managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory... :(
If we had done it earlier on things might have turned out much differently.
You must not have paid attention to Bush's inaugural address, not to mention other of his speeches. Bush most definitely sees a big picture, and not only in the Middle East.
I'm sure the South Vietnamese would have loved to be in the same situation as the South Koreans are in today.
It certainly couldn't have been much worse...
It began with the fatal mistake of supporting France in its attempt to re-establish its colonial control of Indo-China. We should have supported Uncle Ho before he turned to Communism. That said, once we became engaged in Viet Nam we should have prosecuted the war in earnest.
Iraq bears little similarity to the Viet Nam conflict.
WWII was pretty much of a mess for a long time, too. Most wars the US gets into are pretty much of a mess at first.
I wouldn't bet on that. We *still* have troops in Germany, Italy, Japan, and South Korea.
Iraqis are not Islamic fundamentalists; they're not Wahhabis.
lack of tolerance and
That smacks of racism. Why don't you just call them ignorant backwards 'Ay-rabs' and be done with it?
'We' aren't putting in a government - the Iraqi people are. Or are you voting in the election come Sunday?
What do you think would have happened once the UN sanctions were lifted?
Sell out to whom? The Iraqi Sunnis? Zarqawi? Iran?
No, most are Wahhabis of various nationalities.
They had severed their ties with him long *before* the 9-11 attacks.
Well, then. I suppose we'll just have to give up in despair, turn tale, and run home. Maybe the terrorists will leave us in peace then...
How much clearer than a democratic Middle East can they be? You're simply not paying attention to what Bush has been saying since his second State of the Union address.
Why? You've already pointed out that the Saudis and Pakistanis can't control terrorists within their borders. What makes you think an Iraqi dictator could?
bloodbath of purges, but that was
So, bloodbaths are okay if 'our' guy is running the show? It wasn't right when we let it happen in the past and it wouldn't be any more right if it happened in the future.
What makes you so sure the clerics will wind up in charge?
Beats me, but I thought your post merited a response...