Re: Rail Gun Control...

Aug 03, 2003 23 Replies

Frank wrote: : : I had another thought. Is this kit a scale-up of the 1/72-1/76 Hasegawa kit? : NO! It may have more in common with the Mauve and/or Ironside offering than the very simplified Hasegawa offering.

I never got a good look at the Mauve offering, but the Ironside gun I do have. The plate truss that forms the cradle is PE (looks to be 0.080). Dragon, of course, did this in a very large plastic part that goes much the length of the box (IIRC). To this skeleton you add outer plates and inner bulkheads. Not much detail, but then, neither does the real thing. :-)

The Ironside trucks were probably the worst feature of the kit. The Dragon parts look to be much better. The Hasegawa parts are quite crude in comparison (of course, the Hasegawa kit is rather old, I believe, and all of the 1/72 Hasegawa armor kits are pretty simplified).

And, yeah, a K5 is not a K5(e). I believe the K5 is a WWI piece?

Bruce

Didnt say it was. Inference was the K5 at Aberdeen was the one survivor of this type.... it isnt.

Yes I've seen pictures of these platforms, and I have also seen some shots of the spur construction so I'm not sure A) whether all of the weapons used them or B) whether the spur method was simply used for the lower calibre rail mounts or C) The platform was developed as way of getting around having to do the construction and therefore rendered said method obsolete.

Thanks for the heads up on the Baluard kit.

Jeff

Try and find a new SS book on the rail guns in action Very interesting aboout deployment. Much use of camo netting all over.

Charlie

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required