The yellow spine, tailfeathers and wing bands on XG204/B, Fighter Combat School, CFE, West Raynham 1961 (the cover painting subject) have been bothering me unreasonably. I associate the yellow markings with the two-seat Hunters, on a silver background. Looking through my few references, I can't find any mention of such a scheme.
Dick Ward's book "Hunter Squadrons of the Royal Air Force and Fleet Air Arm" naturally includes the CFE, and he has two photos of interest. Both are F.6's. The photographs are monochrome, the colour notes are provided by the author, who is the well-respected name behind the Modeldecal line.
One is XG204/B in 1963 at Binbrook on the DFCS/63 Sqn, the successor to the FCS. The spine and fin are dayglo, there don't seem to be any wing bands (but the wings are edge-on). The title "Fighter Combat School" is missing from the nose, replaced by a small copy of 63 Sdn's emblem
The other is XF382/R, of the Fighter Combat School in 1961 at Stradishall. It is marked exactly as the Revell diagram, except that the fin code is white *and the spine, tail and wing bands are dayglo*. Behind can just be seen a pale fin with a black B on it - surely XG204.
What I'd like some help with is:
1) Did XG204 have yellow markings at any stage? The CFE seems to have gone in for lots of different schemes, so it is quite possible, but a positive reference would take away any doubt.
2) Did XG204 wear dayglo markings like XF382 at any time? Somehow I like the dayglo idea better than trainer yellow, and the rest of the markings are confirmed in Dick Ward's book.
3) Have Revell gone for trainer yellow (with or without photographic evidence) because they can't make a recipe for dayglo orange out of their paint line?
and of course
4) Does it matter?
Well, I think it does because I have a tin of Humbrol 192 Blaze in the paint locker, and like the dayglo idea rather better than yellow...
Does anyone have any answers? What would you use to reproduce dayglo orange if you wanted to?