SW and multiple cores

designer/engineer
Brewer... notice I can't even spell semi)
Now it's correct Brewer.
Ignorant:
"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned out poorly." .... Tom Brewer
Ignorant:
"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own advice. See above.
Ignorant:
Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for doing so.
Ignorant:
"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting what he's often like.
Ignorant:
Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.
Ignorant:
Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.
Ignorant:
Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done... now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.
Ignorant:
Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.
Ignorant:
Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the SolidWorks Bible:
"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."
Ignorant:
Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.
Ignorant:
Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25 SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.
Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:
"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."
"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."
Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user interface problems:
"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."
Conclusion:
Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.
Jon Banquer San Diego, CA
formatting link

Reply to
larryrozer
Loading thread data ...
" I dropped out of high school to pursue my dream of making a lot of money and never went back" - Jon Banquer - Dec 28, 2002
"I'm the kind of person who doesn't learn very well reading pure theory. I get bored really quick." - Jon Banquer - High School Drop Out with ADD, posted July 22, 2007
"make the video interesting like you did for the razor. Without a practical real world example like the razor I find myself losing interest quickly." - Jon Banquer - High School Drop Out with ADD, posted Aug 3, 2006
"What you have shown is how "clueless" you and other engineers are" - Jon Banquer - High School Drop Out with ADD, posted - June 30, 2007
"Most engineers and posters to this forum are hardly professional" - Jon Banquer - High School Drop Out , posted June 2 , 2006
"Too bad but then it's hard to expect much from many SaladWorks / Preventor product loyalists." - Jon Banquer - Jan 6, 2006
"Toss the SaladWorks and go with VX. It might help give you a whole new outlook on life." - Jon Banquer - Jan 9, 2006
"It's too bad Matt has such an ego problem but hey he's not alone when it comes to engineers." - Jon Banquer - High School Drop Out with ADD, posted - Jan 10, 2006
"For the record I like SolidWorks" Jon Banquer April 10, 1998
"I think SolidWorks will always be better at modeling and assembly though. SolidWorks should have ALL the tools you need by April of 99 or close" - Jon Banquer - Oct 22, 1998
"I'd hate to be using SolidWorks" - Jon Banquer - Jan 15, 2005
"Is it any wonder SaladWorks is now such a POS... and it's only gonna get worse. ." - Jon Banquer - May 20, 2005
"my copy of SolidWorks 2007 Bible showed up today." - Jon Banquer - May 31, 2007
"I'm the kind of person who doesn't learn very well reading" - Jon Banquer - July 22, 2007
"I definitely feel I'm getting my $600 bucks worth from the SolidProfessor videos I just purchased." - Jon Banquer - June 28, 2007
Reply to
brewertr
[ Hopefully SolidWorks 2004 will use ACIS as it's modeling kernel. This alone should help to make moving between surfaces and solids much, much easier because ACIS has the surfacing tools that Parasolid simply does not have. ] jon_banquer-
[ If I were to guess at this point what system is best it would be UG ] - Jon Banquer-
Well Jon, how can that be since UG has long used the Parasolid kernel?
Reply to
brewertr
[ The only thing I agree with is, do most of us even need the accuracy Parasolid or Acis supports? I don't think so and I'm sure many people or programs feel they do not need to be as accurate. ]-Jon Banquer-
No not ignorant....it's way beyond ignorant it's Banquer-Ignorant
Reply to
brewertr
Ignorant:
ROFLMAO....Jon, AutoCAD is a CAD program!
You mixed up CAM with CAD again.
They are different you know, you do know don't you, that CAD programs DON'T generate G-Code?
Tom
Reply to
brewertr
[ You don't even post with SmartCAM, you generate G-code as you go along. ]-Jon Banquer-
With your comprehension problems it's easy to see why you are confused. SmartCAM calls their post processors "code generators".
ROFLMAO... another gem from Jon-the-Donk.....
Here you can download a bunch of free;
formatting link
Open a few of them in a text editor (I know you are confused about text editors, FYI: Microsoft Word, Notepad or WordPad will work.) that may give you a clue as to what a Post Processor/Code Generator looks like.
OH! And by the way when you are finished programming tool path in SmartCAM and are ready to you know generate G-Code (v 11.5);
Click on: 1) Process 2) Code
When the code panel comes up
3) Machine 4) Choose a) TMP file b) SMF file 5) File 6) Accept
Now you can generate Machine G-Code, without the TMP or SMF (code generator/post processor) files you can't because G-Code doesn't exist until the programmer generates it.
Tom
Reply to
brewertr
Are you saying someone is paying a high school drop out (you), machine operator (you) to design & model parts where you have no schooling or work experience in engineering, design, drafting or solid modeling where you have nearly 2 whole months experience using SolidWorks 2007? If so what they save using untrained and unqualified personnel designing parts they can use towards product liability insurance. I wonder, do they falsify the credentials of the person signing off on the design and drawings as well?
So your "Clients" are hiring a machine operator (you) to design and draw up their parts even when you haven't finished your SolidWorks video tutorials yet?
Reply to
brewertr
I'm a complete idiot. Read what "No User", Bottleboob and some others have posted. It's ALL TRUE !!!! - Jon Banquer-
Reply to
brewertr
[ You never chain geometry in Gibbs or SmartCAM. It's not necessary. ]- Jon Banquer -
[ I hope I provided some good info on Gibbs Machining Markers and the FACT that Gibbs doesn't have chaining tools. ]-Jon Banquer-
[ Can you show us how you "chained" that geometry in Gibbscam, Bob? ] - Jon Banquer-
[ For someone like Dr. Battleboob, GibbSCAM is the PERFECT system. ] -Jon Banquer-
[ Gibbscam IS a virus. ] -Jon Banquer-
[ You don't even post with SmartCAM, you generate G-code as you go along. ]- Jon Banquer-
[ because MS Word was never designed to be a text editor ] -Jon Banquer-
Reply to
brewertr

Site Timeline

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.