Tolerance decimal placements

Is there anyway to specify decimal placements for the min. and max. variations in a bilateral tolerance separately? For instance, if I want +0.005 to -0, instead of +0.005 to -0.000.

Reply to
cadout
Loading thread data ...

I guess the question I have is "Why?".

Matt

Reply to
fcsuper

My bosses want it to look a certain way that's displayed in our catalog (+0.005 to -0). Does 0.000 indicate a level of precision different than 0? That's what they're concerned about.

Reply to
cadout

There are NO degrees of nothing. zero = nothing. 3 zeroes = nothing. Therefore zero = 3 zeroes = nothing.

Reaper.

Reply to
Reaper2561

ANSI Y14.5 states that for inch dimensions the prime dimension and the tolerance that applies to it shall be quoted to the same number of decimal places ie 5.000 +0.010/-0.005.

This does not apply to millimeter dimensions.

This of course only applies to drawings, your catalogue your rules!

---------------------------------------------- Posted with NewsLeecher v1.0 Final * Binary Usenet Leeching Made Easy *

formatting link

Reply to
Anonymous

Thank you. What about if the prime dimension is a fraction. So, for your previous example, is 5" +0.010/-0.005 accurate? And if so, can the two variations of the tolerance have different decimal placements? Can I do this in Solidworks: +0.01/-0.005

Reply to
cadout

I believe that Solidworks complies with ANSI 14.5 so NO you cannot do that. There may be a way of overriding it, but....??

This is what ANSI Y14.5 states:

.500 +/-.005 is good .50 +/-.005 is not good

.500 +.005/-.000 is good .500 +.005/-0 is not good

.750/.748 is good .75/.748 is not good

Take note, a zero is not places before the decimal point on values less than one inch.

To the best of my knowledge fractions are not allowed under ANSI Y14.5, only because I dont see any reference to them.

---------------------------------------------- Posted with NewsLeecher v1.0 Final * Binary Usenet Leeching Made Easy *

formatting link

Reply to
Anonymous

Could you please explain the rationale in the first and last example?

1) five hundred (500) +/-.005 is good fifty (50) +/-.005 is not good 3) seven hundred fifty (750) /.748 is good [that's a huge tolerance!] seventy-five (75) /.748 is not good [that's still a huge tolerance!]

What's missing here?

Reply to
Bruce Bretschneider

There are rules for fractional tolerancing as well, but these are not what is being asked about.

Bruce, I think you missed the decimal point. it's 1/2", not 500 and

  1. ...and 3/4", not 750 and 75.

Matt sw.fcsuper.com

Reply to
fcsuper

cadout,

Ditto to the other response. The proper Ansi way is keep the decimal places the same throughout the dimension. If you are using inches in your catalog, and use uneven decimal places, there's actually a chance customers may mistake your drawing for metric, which would not be a good thing at all.

Matt

Reply to
fcsuper

Hi Bruce, I cant explain why but the decimal point didn't show up, they should be point 500

--

--------------------------------- --- -- - Posted with NewsLeecher v3.7 Final Web @

formatting link
----- ---- -- -

Reply to
pipsqueek

Thanks for all the input. I appreciate it, will pass it along.

Reply to
cadout

No decimal points showed on my screen. That's why the question.

Reply to
Bruce Bretschneider

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.