Bachmann 37/0 haulage test.

Dec 25, 2004 7 Replies

Since the weather today is so reasonable (5 degrees Celsius and not much wind around these parts) I decided to try a haulage test on D6826.



For this test, I used normal bog-standard Dapol goods wagons, with tension lock couplings and complete with the built-in weight. This means: - that it is only really possible to perform the test on the straight, because any deviation from a straight line will cause the tension- lock couplings to pull the wagons off the track. Replacing them with Kadees will, of course, solve this. - that if I removed all the weights, the loco would be capable of pulling many more wagons.



Here we go: - On the level the locomotive will pull 100 wagons. - Up a 1 in 78 incline the locomotive will pull 70 wagons.



(I also have kit-built 72XX and 5205 class locos, and their haulage capacity is similar.)


John Sullivan wrote:-

Does your example pull equally well in both directions as mine is noticeably better No1 end first?

(kim)

In message , kim writes

Sorry, I only tried it one way. I'll have another go tomorrow if the weather is still good.

Just out of interest John, and as you have the test facilities in your garden, what rtr loco has the most haulage capacity?

Merry Xmas to you.

Simon

In message , piemanlarger writes

Of the ones I've tested it would appear to be the Heljan class 47, unless you also want to include my American 4-unit electric loco in that.

I'd love to be able to test my Broadway "A" class on your layout. It took

130 bachman 14 ton tankers around our club layout, including up the curved incline!

Apparently the Heljan weston seems to be a good hauler, but I dont think it would achieve the above. I think the hornby class 50 is the best rtr Brit loco I have seen so far.

Can't be bad, if some of us put a 4 Unit loco on our layouts we wouldn't have the room to hitch anything up to it. ;-(

Careful Simon, you'll get the chat for "Top Posting"..................hope you're not using OE.................are you going to chat him, John ???

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required