There's a picture of a Class 2 2-6-0 plus tender in the article about the Severn Trent Valley Railway in the latest club magazine. That might be a clue that Bachmann is about to start work on one their own? There's also a picture of a "K4" whatever that might be?
Well let's hope your suspicions are prophetic. The 'little' 2-6-0 cries out to be modelled properly - it's the ideal size of loco for most layouts and one of my favourites.
Indeed. The old Hornby model is now very dated compared to modern offerings. Would this mean they are updating the Ivatt 2-6-2 chassis to make it easier for DCC?
I think the second part of your post answers the first part. The old Ivatt will be woefully dated compared to the new one. Methinks they'll take the opportunity to phase out the 2-6-2 altogether.
I believe the Ivatt 2-6-2T has been Bachmann's best selling loco of all time and I'd hate to see it dropped as it still sells well. If they are to do a 'Blue Ribband' 2-6-0 then it wouldn't take a genius to design a chassis which could be used in both the tank and tender loco.
IIRC Bachmann did announce a Standard 2 tank a while back as being on a list of future models involving an upgrade of the Ivatt chassis to Blue Riband standard.
Mike Parkes snipped-for-privacy@mphgate.removetoreply demon.co.uk
I'd have thought there's no point in their even announcing a BR standard version until they've caught up on the backlog of models they've announced but which don't seem to be anywhere near release. Examples: Pullmans, GUVs, etc., some of which were in last year's catalog.
K4 could be either of two things - but if the SVR is involved then it probably /isn't/ the large and elegant Pennsy Pacific ;)
In the .ukian context a K4 is a medium-boilered three-cylinder Gresley
2-6-0: think of the big-boiler 3-cyl K3 but wearing a boiler of more or less the same proportions as the 2-cylinder K2. A special for the West Highland, and a handsome creation.
The first of 'em was later rebuilt as the sole K111, prototype for the Thompson/Peppercorn K1s (all the original small-boiler Gresley K1s having gone by then, natch).
The bits under the running plate should be pretty similar, ditto much of the cab and tender. I don't /think/ the wheel spacing differed, but others will know.
The nice thing (apart from the K4 - a nice thing per se) is that doing the K4 boiler /could/ allow a K2 at a later stage, using a different set of cylinders (and probably a slightly different wheel spacing - think the firebox was smaller. Maybe a new chassis..). A K1 would be possible, too. Depends how much compromise could be accepted these days....
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.