Regular ACAD is rather disappointing in terms of 3D, unless the models are really simple. For useable 3D models by Autodesk you have to get Inventor or Mechanical desktop at the least. I know some folks will post saying "I've modeled a full scale minotaur with hair and everything using ACAD" and bla bla bla, but 3D is not ACAD's strength, period. If you only need 3D for this 1 project, it might not be worth it, but if yur company is looking into evolving to 3D, consider Inventor or Solid Edge.
"hutchini" a écrit dans le message de news: firstname.lastname@example.org...
You may have to redraw all the drawings in 3d, as long as you have enough views of the objects and all relevant dimensions this is not impossible just time consuming. you will need front and back views, both side views and top and bottom views.
"Michael Bulatovich" a écrit dans le message de news:e8k3ia$jpp$ email@example.com...
AND, I'm going on vacation in about an hour, for 2 weeks, so there. No relevance whatsoever, but I had to share the joy. If ever you're in Rimouski, Quebec in the next week, email me and we'll grab a beer or coffee in the shade. And a nice cigar.
"longshot" a écrit dans le message de news:W9zrg.122$pB.64@trnddc06...
What good would it do to model a small town in 3D ? For an animation movie, sure, but for dimensioning ? Please give me 1 good reason to spend more then
15 minutes on a single building, if that, for size reference. As for an industrial plant, you do individual sections, if not individual machines, and Xref them if you need a global view. Anyone who models a full-scale plant in full detail in ACAD deserves the nervous breakdown he (she) will no doubt suffer. ACAD sucks for 3D, that is my opinion based on my experience. You obviously adhere to ACAD for modeling, and I hope you have numerous years of success doing so. All I said is that 3D is not ACAD's forte.
You probably have a minotaur in your repertoire.
p.s. I'll still buy you a beer if you come down to Rimouski, you know.
I have a solidworks license at my disposal as well as acad 2000i, 2006, &
2007. the solid works can do things the acad can't & it definitely has its place, for large projects it bogs down any computer you try & run it on. ACAD is the industry standard & we are sharing files with many disciplines. it's really the only option for modeling plants.
True -- but then ,that depend . If you are drawing a whole city ,then each building will proberly be a useless box, useless to project the individual building from , but not useless if all you ask is a town scene just the outside panels, still these are two different things and nomatter what trouble you face with AutoCAD one thing is sure, it acturly project the house --- but ofcaurse not if all your house is, is an emty Solid just acting the outher limits of the house. Still what I like about AutoCAD is that you know the dimensions are right and what you can draw in 3D can be build.
Then again --- even architecture are in for a change ; all these smart programs offer is acturly just how things alway's been done, just re-written into fast computer code, the architect application is still mainly a database that store windows and doors just as how you would have written it into a tradisional paperbased account. The way it shuld work, is that you in detail draw and project the building and _then_ ask the computer program to calculate the building compoments that will produce this house -- only one concept work that way , 3D-H .