OT-Interesting website on Terrorism

This website is of rather special interest. Its content and research is done by Ryan Mauro..a 17yr old high school Jr, who is making a rather good name for himself in the field of research on terrorism. In fact..he is rather well paid for his services by a number of different civilian and governmental organizations.

Click on the About Us link on the site.

Very interesting reading and pretty well matches what my own independant sources are saying. This kid will indeed be a name to watch in the years to come.

formatting link

Gunner

"A vote for Kerry is a de facto vote for bin Laden." Strider

Reply to
Gunner
Loading thread data ...

Well, he has a picture of bush right next to a mushroom cloud on the front page, looks like he has a pretty good grasp of things.

Reply to
sittingduck

interesting also that work done by a high school student several years ago, was included in uk governement documents, which were used to justify attacking the people of Iraq (who unlike the us have no obvious links to either acts of terror, or to sponsorship of terrorist states!)

Reply to
brain dead

I was unaware that the ACLU was a "suspicious organization."

(quote)

12.Kerry?s wife is closely tied to, and receives backing from these suspicious groups:

Tidas Foundation War Resisters League International Action Center International ANSWER United for Peace and Justice Democratic Justice Fund Council for American-Islamic Relations National Lawyers Guild Earth Island Institute American Civil Liberties Union

etc. (endqoute)

================================================== please reply to: JRR(zero) at yktvmv (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com ==================================================

Reply to
jim rozen

What you might want to understand is that the US LIKES to attack and invade, we ARE fuc*ing war mongers, especially if there is strategic position and natural resources involved. We are really good at making weapons and we need a place to use them up to make room for the next generations of weapon systems. We all get rich making stuff for the war effort and it's good for our economy. I make stuff for Sikorski so I have a stake in this, jobs and families here depend on the income, so I hope the Iraqis shoot down a BUNCH of Blackhawks...we can make more!!! Every congressional district benefits according to how congress allocates money to the war effort and I hope they use the weapon systems from each district fairly and spread the wealth. My buddy makes the wire for TOW missiles and they haven't been using enough of them lately and he needs to sell more wire. So, the commanders in the field need to take this into consideration and make sure that my buddy gets his fair share of gov contracts. And the best part of all is that Iraqi oil will eventually pay for it all as the US sucks the sand dry. We also make stuff that aids in cleaning-up after terrorist bomb attacks. Life is GOOD!!! A few more wars, a few more bomb attacks and I can retire in comfort.

I still think that we ought to go after Canada next. Logistics would be simple and they already have a good distribution system for beer in place. We won't have to rebuild everything, and we'll make sure the breweries are left intact. Hopefully we don't kill too many Canadians...I like Canadians.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

And here I thought you were going to ask what Gunner's "own, independent sources" are independent of.

This really is a remarkable site. Either the kid has out-Drudged Drudge, or he's the most f*cked-up conspiracy theorist in the Western hemisphere.

Only his psychiatrist knows for sure. It will be interesting to read around the edges of this, to see what other sources have to say. As it is, he's stirring together a real mixed pot of independent sources, many of them little known, and third hand rumor, which is Drudge's stock-in-trade. The question is what kind of soup it really makes. It depends on the cook.

Ed Huntress

Reply to
Ed Huntress

not crossposted

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:30:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner" brought forth from the murky depths:

Well, if the Feds weren't already watching you closely, Tom, they sure as hell are NOW, after that statement. (It doesn't matter that it was said in jest.) We'll certainly understand what happened if you stop posting here in the next 24 hours. (Can I have your mill?)

------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poverty is easy. *

formatting link
's Charity and Chastity that are hard. * Data-based Website Design

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to
Larry Jaques

I think they were ALREADY watching me but they got realy bored. (I still want to learn explosive metal forming) I'm sure my PO keeps them informed.

Sure, you can have my BP, but you have to haul it out. I olnly need a good file or a few bi-metal blades to take with me.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

Of course not, you are a Lefty.

Any other names in there you consider up front and beyond reproach?

Gunner

"A vote for Kerry is a de facto vote for bin Laden." Strider

Reply to
Gunner

Yup..sure does. So far the kid (like Drudge) has been batting really good.

Another article of interview of interest:

formatting link
Gunner

"A vote for Kerry is a de facto vote for bin Laden." Strider

Reply to
Gunner

formatting link
"A vote for Kerry is a de facto vote for bin Laden." Strider

Reply to
Gunner

What flavor cake do you like?

Gunner

"A vote for Kerry is a de facto vote for bin Laden." Strider

Reply to
Gunner

Lenox cake please, and cigs to trade to bubba for some good lovin', and maybe some kind of soothing salve.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

Oh yeah, he's a regular crystal ball. Here's something he wrote last October -

"And so I conclude with a message to the media: The Iraqis are cheerfully watching the progress being made, and we, too, should be seeing it."

Wayne

Reply to
wmbjk

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 15:35:36 GMT, "Tom Gardner" brought forth from the murky depths:

I can imagine. ;)

Please ship it to me before they pick you up, alright? Got my address? Oh, thanks again!

Rightio!

------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poverty is easy. *

formatting link
's Charity and Chastity that are hard. * Data-based Website Design

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to
Larry Jaques

its pretty obvious the us economy is based on tax dollars subsidising high tech weapns industry!

the thing that seems very clear to me though is that the us has very little regard for the millions of people that have died as a direct result of either us terror, or us sponsored terror!

it seems as though in common with nazi Germany, the us has assumed the doctrine of "Untermenschen" which is the feeling that many races are inferior, and merit no consideration should they fall victim to us aggression!

not one of the many postings on the subject of Iraq that have appeared on this forum recently, has expressed any regret whatsoever over the one million Iraq people that have died since 1991.........."Untermenschen" indeed!

Reply to
brian

Not just High-tech, even the most sophisticated weapon needs lots of low-tech stuff

We reguard the millions VERY highly, without them our fancy, expensive weapons would be just blowing-up dirt. It's hard to quantify blowing-up dirt. "We blew-up 4,000 cubic yards of dirt today with our SX-2000 rocket" It's not the same as saying "We blew-up 4,000 people with our SX-2000 rocket." From a performance point of view, which sounds better to the committee buying the SX-2000???

I don't think race is any part of it!!! We are an "Equal-Opportunity Destroyer" We Do have laws against discrimination and it's possible that there may be a quota system. We MAY have to blow-up so many blacks, whites, Asians, Indians and Latinos in order to comply with the law. I wonder if there is any International Law reguarding race discrimination for who gets blowed-up.

Probably the only regret expressed in the US is that we didn't have the contract to supply the body bags.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

The old hands knew that the invaded were unlikely to stand around applauding the occupying forces. Obviously those old hands were right, and a big mess is now a way-bigger-mess. But this kid, who you would have us believe is wise, didn't have a clue. I suppose you'll be telling us that nobody really knew what was going to happen. Well, looks like this other guy had a pretty good handle on it, guess who -

"Trying to eliminate Saddam?would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible. We had been unable to find Noriega in Panama, which we knew intimately. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and other allies pulling out as well?. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the U.N.'s mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the U.S. could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land."

Wayne

Reply to
wmbjk

There you go speaking about America in the third person.

What are *you* going to do?

If America has been committing the crimes you claim, why have you done nothing about it, and why have you been a willing accomplice?

Reply to
Scott

That your thought processes are juvenile is apparent in every post. So tell us gunner, I know that you stretch your political propaganda into the survivalism definition. I would like to see how you stretch it into the cnc and metal working ng charters though.

Reply to
Bob Brock

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.