OT: Need a hand

Yeah, I think it's a very good piece, and it's very similar to my own judgment of events, but I was surprised at the way they structured it. _The Economist_ doesn't usually use such a dramatic structure, with the buildup and then the balance at the end. More often they use an essay style, in which the caveats and counterarguments are presented at the beginning.

-- Ed Huntress

Reply to
Ed Huntress
Loading thread data ...

Jeez. It's a simple political analysis, not an econometric matrix. 8-) (can't find my hat...)

-- Ed Huntress

Reply to
Ed Huntress

BS "over my head I'm sure" NOT

JC

Reply to
John R. Carroll

Frat boy ready to ship out or something like that.

Yes it works. Mart> Would someone with a minute to spare please try this URL and tell me if they

formatting link

Reply to
Martin H. Eastburn

Thanks, Martin. Some day I'll figure out which of their articles I'm paying for. It seems like a lot of them are free.

-- Ed Huntress

Reply to
Ed Huntress

On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:28:58 -0500, the infamous "Ed Huntress" scrawled the following:

Yes, it comes up for me, and I'm not a subscriber.

Shrubby, the frat boy, indeed... The way the Economist views him is the same way I always have (and then some): with complete disdain. I'm surprised that they backed him in 2000. The article sent me to the dictionary twice.

(Note to Gunner: I know you wouldn't have liked this last paragraph but if you want to talk about it, you'll have to take it to email. After seeing your half-dozenth reply to trolls this morning, I finally had to plonk you, too. Life's too short. Why _do_ you waste your time on the homunculi? )

------------------------------------------- Jack Kevorkian for Congressional physician! ===========================================

Reply to
Larry Jaques

Thanks.

He looked like an easygoing, slightly right-of-center caretaker before 2000. That's all many people thought we needed at the time -- me included. I agree that he struck me as a frat boy, but I was not comfortable with Al Gore, who I feared was just chewing at the bit, waiting to explode a '60s-style liberal program on us, after those years of being cooped up with Clinton and his right-of-center economics. And I hadn't paid attention to the "Project for the New American Century" enrollment. I thought they were just some fringe neocons we'd never heard of. Jeez, I'll never forgive myself for not checking that out.

Par, for _The Economist_. The Britishisms are fun. The punctuation keeps this old-time editor reaching for a blue pencil, reflexively, until I remember I'm reading a British magazine. We're both saddled with the punctuation handed to us by 18th-century typesetters, but they had smarter typesetters.

I see you've added the word "homunculi" to your lexicon. You should read _The Economist_ more. It's good for you. d8-)

-- Ed Huntress

Reply to
Ed Huntress

Rel.202988$ snipped-for-privacy@en-nntp-09.dc.easynews.com...

Ed,

The story is indeed "Squeezy Money".

If this gambit had been pulled off by some London financiers I am certain that the Economist would have shouted and lauded the perpetrators from the roof tops.

But for a bunch of lousy German engineers, in the auto business no less, to pull this off is indeed distasteful and should be verboten:-)) Imagine mere engineers stealing bread from London bankers.

As one commentator had it "turn around is fair play" or "couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of people" or some such thing.

Wolfgang

Reply to
wfhabicher

Oh, yeah, that was a good story, one that I think was underreported in the general press in the US.

I was impressed. Who would have thought that Porsche had it in them to play a financial gamble like that, against far bigger players? As I said, it was a George Soros moment -- testicles as big as Montana.

-- Ed Huntress

Reply to
Ed Huntress

I could see it. I'm a cyberspace idiot, running whatever Dell did with this machine coupla years ago. XP Pro, etc.

Reply to
Don Foreman

That's good. Thanks, Don. Some of the people to whom I sent the e-mail are cyberspace idiots, too -- like me, as well. d8-)

-- Ed Huntress

Reply to
Ed Huntress

Somewhere in the house is a 4GB and 8GB thumbdrive. I bought the 8 when I lost the 4. I bought the 4 when I lost the 1. I found the one after I bought the 4, I found the 4 after I bought the 8. I guess it is time to buy a 16 so I can find the 8 and the 4.

I hope that is isn't a progression series ;)

I gotta look into using truecrypt for anything I want to keep private since these things are way to easy too lose or misplace.

Wes

Reply to
Wes

On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:51:30 -0500, the infamous "Ed Huntress" scrawled the following:

I kick myself for having turned down their offer of a free subscription years ago. It's -not- a cheap script.

------------------------------------------- Jack Kevorkian for Congressional physician! ===========================================

Reply to
Larry Jaques

On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:50:17 -0500, the infamous "Ed Huntress" scrawled the following:

Yeah, "ageing" and "defence" got me twitchin', too.

I felt certain that you'd notice that, Ed.

---------------------------------------------------------- --== EAT RIGHT...KEEP FIT...DIE ANYWAY ==--

Reply to
Larry Jaques

On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 05:26:22 -0500, the infamous Wes scrawled the following:

the 4 after

Invest in a keychain model. I bet you won't lose -that- one!

------------------------------------------- Jack Kevorkian for Congressional physician! ===========================================

Reply to
Larry Jaques

Well, you know what I'm talking about, then. These neat little electronic devices have a way of getting lost.

-- Ed Huntress

Reply to
Ed Huntress

That's good. Thanks, Don. Some of the people to whom I sent the e-mail are cyberspace idiots, too -- like me, as well. d8-)

-- Ed Huntress

Ed, you didn't send it to me, except on RCM. I saw it "2 x 4", or whatever the hams say. I'm surprised Iggy didn't weight in here. Reckon he's sick or somethin?.

Bob Swinney

Reply to
Robert Swinney

I sent the e-mail to a couple of relatives and some friends who aren't on RCM, Bob. I figured anyone here who was interested would see the URL in my post.

There's nothing much new in that article; it's just one of the most thorough roundups I had seen. And _The Economist_ is considered fair by the people who know it, and no enemy of GWB, so that added some interest.

-- Ed Huntress

Reply to
Ed Huntress

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.