"amdx" fired this volley in news:c046c$4dc7d7e5 $18ec6dd7$ snipped-for-privacy@KNOLOGY.NET:
That's actually not necessary, and not great practice. Transformers are designed to run essentially forever at their rating, and "regulate" best at near their rated load.
If you nearly doubled the ampacity of the secondary from what you needed, the voltage drop in 'buck' could be much greater than you anticipated.
In his _particular_ case, that's not a terrible problem, since his VFD will run down to 200V. But in some cases it could cause trouble.
LLoyd
I'll argue your response a bit.
He responded with a rating of 5.7KVA this works out to 25.9 amps at 220 Volts.
Being that he'll be driving a VFD I suspect the current will have current pulses that may average 16 amps but may actually peak at 25 amps or more. As far as "regulate" best at near rated load, I don't see that as true, you will always have I^2R losses in the wire being equal for any equal current change whether a full load or half load. If you are at full load near core saturation your losses will increase if the current increases. So regulation could actually be worse. I agree with you on "the voltage drop in 'buck' could be much greater than you anticipated" if the current is not at rated load. This could work for or against him. This may all be null as his transformer probably isn't this big. Just my two cents, Mikek