No, but that's not the point. The point is, you can't prove they did not test them.
I wouldn't say that's the only explanation, but it does seem to be the most likely.
Now you're jumping to conclusions. It's entirely possible that the motors were tested but no data is available.
Dave W. wrote:
Who cares besides you & Jerry?
You missed the point.
Typical moron.
Who ever said it did?
THAT AXE!
Actually he did. Because TRA has an affirmative duty to publish tests.
A self-defined one.
Jerry replied:
Lack of published data is not in itself proof of non-testing. It's only proof of failure to provide data.
Bob implied that, when he asked if I would "bet my life" that the motors would have accurate delays.
Since there isn't data, it's irrelevant to surmise that a test occurred anyway... what would be the significance if there were these "data-less tests"? And what grounds are there to even propose that they happened?
-dave w
It is for the purpose of the rules.
Kiss-ass-TRA-lackey of course.
I've got a bunch of 1970 vintage Estes motors inthe blue tubes. Many ahve been decertified for years. Others are legal for me to use at NARAM next month. GO figure!
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!
Give me access to ALL of TMTs data, and I'll prove they didn't. WHich is why TRA insists on keeping things secret. It's a cover-up.
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!
Who cares? Maybe you can spend some "quality time" discussing it with Cato.
He cannot comprehend EVEN when spoken to as a child. He is a true moron.
Jerry
Tripoli members and leaders do not care about motor cert corruption. This much we DO know.
Jerry
Name calling, huh, jerry.
See, even you couldn't pass up the response.
He does a great job of controlling the "keep rmr about jerry" club.
Joel. phx
>
I DO own their lives.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required