But the Estes MR safety code saves consumers from hazard associated with these clearly badly designed products. The safety code IS the thing. The firm's code, not some codified, regulated, never even enforced as stated version.
The FIRM safety code is voluntarily complied with and therefore self-enforcing and FAR more effective than ANY law will EVER be.
Then why not allow uncertified motors too to widen the choices and farm new manufacturers into the contest scene for later contest certification ala FAI?
There's 2. The entire Cox line, along with the old Estes X-15 made up my "dangerous modle rocket list" at least until the mini X-wing jumped to the top.
I remember an old Ft Wayne MAR, where someone pranged the estes X-15 into the asphalt parking lot. It stuck like a lawn dart and came out without a scratch :-(
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!
What were the problems with the Cox rockets in regard to the Saturn V and Saturn 1B? Were they unstable, or just underpowered, or what?
They seem fairly rare (frankly, I don't recall even seeing them in stores, but they were apparently out during my "early adult hiatus" from rocketry), and I've never seen one fly (though I've managed to obtain one each, unflown). If there are problems with them, I'd like to know.
I think they were out when I was involved in other things for a while too. I picked up the X-15 about 6 years ago from a shop that was closing. It flies great, it just doesn't want to stop flying.
The X-15 bt is so small and tight that even the smallest chute wants to hang up. There is also a plastic nub or two that the lines can snag on and it's easy to pinch a shroud line when putting the nc on after prep. The other models they sold might have similar problems in that the chute area is too confining, snags, etc.
(Mulder mode on) I would assume all of the Cox line was made from the same super strong plastic. My personal opinion is that someone accidentally shipped material to Cox that was supposed to go to Area 51 to be used on the F-117. : ) That could explain why the BATF is working so hard against us.
my COX LJ2 was never particularly dangerous from what I remember..I used to launch it in the backyard with either 1/4A or 1/2A and it would go maybe 40 ft.....cool
BB: I've often wondered why doesn't ESTES come into the 21 st century as far as their engines are concerned....
For example....If they created separate delay train/ejection charges, then a person could mix and match whatever delay they wanted with a particular engine....or they could even off a plug...and the modeler just glues it in?
I have an even better idea....allow everybody to make their own engines and then test them ala FAI prior to use at NAR......NOT.....I don't think so.....
Estes Certainly does (6+) Quest used to (2) till it exploded and killed a couple of people.
If only homeland security, NAR and TRA had not scared away all of those potential custromers.
Just for the record this post explains why Estes discontinues some motors or takes them out of production for extended periods of time.
The same manufacturing constraints apply to them except adding the fact they outsouce from a very small and under capacity supplier. I asked their supplier for some motors and it was beyond their capacity. I would be better off running my own BP machine if only I was willing to live with a deathwish and subject myself to more regulations than a thousand regulators can shake a stick at. Thank GOD Estes is grandfathered. Long live Estes!!!
I have a feeling that just might become available someday. But not from Estes :)
Here's why Estes doesn't: These products are guaranteed to sell well in maybe one percent of the market. After that, certainly no more than
10%, which is a good number for a small manufacturer, but not for Estes.
That said, some could always be sold with the delays pre-glued to satisfy a market segment requiring that. But that's added processing for Estes (pressing the delay grain into its own tube, then gluing that tube into the motor case versus just pressing the delay into the motor case).
The key to the market's wide rejection of the adjustable BP motor is highlighted by this comment: Most dads can barely get the ignitor installed properly. Imagine their consternation when confronted with the task of installing the delay and getting it glued well enough to seal and avoid blow-by.
Even worse, many dads think a C6-7 has much more oomph than a C6-3, so rest assured they can't handle modular delays.
You know, I've never thought of that, but I'll bet you're right.
I wonder if things would work out better if they renumbered them (for example) as C6-H, C6-N, C6-L (for heavy, normal, light) or something of that nature. The actual number, of course, would still be part of the specifications, but from a marketing/ease-of-dummy-use standpoint, that's something to think about.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.