Correct. If he ever finishes with TRA, he'll move on to trying to destroy NAR since NAR has most of the same policies that TRA has. And despite posing his most efforts in the guise of a "reform" crusade, when you get right down to it he's really attacking TRA/NAR because of their policies, NOT because of any alleged internal corruption.
but they are two sides of the same coin
all breaches of fiduciary duties
- iz
Mr. Iz I think you are a bad man.
Karl
I'm curious, Ray... how are the TRA/NAR efforts to discredit/derail/'hurt' ARSA efforts any better...?
It's Pot and Kettle time here, methinks... ;-)
What efforts?? I've seen no one attempting to destroy or dismantle ARSA as Iz is attempting to do to TRA/NAR.
Only because there is nothing to dismantle and no acts to claim are offensive.
That cannot be said for either NAR or TRA. The very fact of how they are organized, the particular methods of advocacy they have chosen and the policies they have, put them in positions.
In the case of ARSA it is like trying to criticize the voting record of a freshman senator. There is no there, there yet.
Jerry
I haven't seen any efforts by ARSA to dismantle NAR or TRA either... just some suggestions that things aren't entirely kosher.
Calling JW, Iz, and others fools for trying a non-TRA approach isn't exactly playing fair, in my book. Especially in a country that is supposed to be the pinnacle of personal freedom and individuality. ;-)
by someone other than ARSA.
Freedom is dead. The above mentioned are trying to kill it.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required