F-4B slatted tailplane

Mar 20, 2006 12 Replies

I'm just gearing up for a major - and I mean *major* - Phantom phrenzy. I'm going to be using the Hasegawa 1/72 kits.



I have plans for three F-4Js, but there are currently none in the Hasegawa range. Instead, I shall use the F-4C/D which is due to be re-released shortly. The main problem with this kit is that it has the non-slatted tailplane, while the F-4J had the slatted type. It's not *too* much of a problem, as I intend to build two F-4Fs, which had the non-slatted tail. I can make a straight swap between the kits.



Anyway, here's my question... ("Finally!" I hear you all sigh...)



F-4Bs were originally fitted with a non-slatted tail, but were retro-fitted with the slatted type. When did the retro-fit programme start? As far as I am aware the slatted tail was introduced in 1966 with the F-4J. None of the references that I have seen give any dates for the change. Am I correct in saying that prior to '66 all F-4Bs had a non-slatted tail?



I have plans for a VF-84 jet as seen in 1965 and so I'm hoping to be able to swap another tailplane.


228 F-4Bs were fitted with the slatted stabilizers during upgrade to F-4N configuration. The first F-4N flew on June 4, 1972. The first renovated F-4Ns joined the fleet in February of 1973.

Yes.

Woohoo! Thanks very much, Al!

*g* I finally got over my personal Phantom frenzy...well, almost... 21 1/48 F-4s and three 1/32 are on the shelfes here...I still have plans for a lot more but now I am able to see that there are other aircraft too I can build... question has already been answered...ok Ingo

*time is an enemy*

Well... my Phantom Phrenzy is currently planned as follows:

F-4B VF-51 MiG Killer F-4N VF-154 F-4J VF-96 Showtime 100 F-4G 561FS, OSW 1996 F-4E 57FIS F-4C 57FIS RF-4B VMCJ-1 F-4S VMA-333 F-4J VF-102, 1972 F-4D "Smash Four" Ritchie's first kill F-4F JBG-36, 1977 F-4F JG74 F-4EJ 302 Sqn JASDF, 1976 F-4E 469TFS Korat AFB 1972 RF-4C 11TRS F-4B VF-84, 1965 F-4J VF-84, 1970 F-4J(UK) 74 Sqn RAF

I have the decals ready and available for all of these. As you can see, I like to build variations on a theme, so there are some showing different markings from the same squadrons. I'm just waiting for someone to release a decent F-4K/M in 1/72 and there will be at least another 8 British aircraft.

Also, bear in mind that I'm doing the same sort of thing with Spitfires, Hunters and F-16s! Add to that my model railway obsession, and I'm set for probably the next five years!!!

The Fujimi Spey Phantoms are very good but a bit difficult to find right now.

Would echo Al's comments on the Fujimi line of British birds. They are much better than the other Fujimi Phantoms in that they got the dogtooth on the leading edge of the wing right this time.

An interesting selection. Surprised that there are not more of the fabulous Japanese Anniversary/Commemorative birds on that list. Hasegawa has done at least two or three dozen very colorful releases of those birds.

Norm

Back in the '70s I went nutso with Airfix's Phantom kit and built as many as I could get. At that time they were available here in MPC boxes at $1.50.

They eventually were dispersed and many were scheduled for replacement with better kits, very few of which were ever started. I tend to do things in waves and the second wave never generated for the Phantom.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

Thanks for the heads up on the Fujimi kits, Al and Norm. I'll keep an eye open for them. I have a Fujimi F-4F and that is quite nice.

To be honest, I'm not really keen on anniversary schemes. I'd much rather build a bog standard line jet. My recollection of squadron life is a hard day-to-day grind with very little time for frivolities such as fancy painting (although having said that, I was the one who designed and painted IV(AC) Sqn RAF's 75th Anniversary Harrier GR.3 - XV738, the first real Harrier ever built).

11 of them on eBay right now (not counting one that is priced an outrageous $49).

Rob

Hannants are advertising a limited edition Alcock and Browne FGR.2 for twenty quid.

(Should that be "Hannants *are* advertising..." or "Hannants *is* advertising..."???)

Ouch!

Depends on whether you're using American or British English... ;-p

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required