# Easy method of scaling dimensions on models

• posted

Eureka! (as they say)

Starting to build a structure and taking measurements off a photo, it all of a sudden struck me that there was a much easier way to do this.

I had planned to measure elements on the photo (actually a laser print of a scanned photo), figure out the scaling factor to HO, then convert all the measurements to scale dimensions, using my scale ruler. The measurements from the print were from an architect's rule, using a finely-divided scale. So what I ended up with was a mind-numbing table of "actual" (from the print) and scale measurements, all in decimals from my calculator that had to be converted, rounded off, etc. Ugh.

But the solution is so simple and beautiful, it's hard to believe I didn't think of it years ago. And I'm sure it's not original with me. Just thought I'd share it here.

Lacking actual illustrations, I'll try to describe it, using these things called, um, words:

This method requires a photo of the thing to be modeled, obviously. (See below for guidelines on this.) The photo should be slightly larger than the scale being modeled, but not too much larger: somewhere between 1.1x and 1.5x or so. It will become obvious why this is so.

On the photo, you need to identify at least one element that you know the actual size of. If one plans ahead, one can actually measure something at the time the photo is taken. In my case, since this is a building, I used one of the doors and assumed it is pretty close to standard height (6'8", or about 80 inches).

The only step involving measurements is this first one to establish the scale; after that, the beauty of this method is that no measurements are needed. No numbers.

Draw two intersecting perpendicular lines. Make sure the vertical line (near the left edge of the sheet) is long enough for the largest element IN THE PICTURE that you want to scale. On an 8-1/2 x 11" sheet, the short edge was just tall enough for my building.

On the vertical line, transfer the size (from the picture) of the object of known size, using a pair of dividers. No need to measure, just carefully transfer the size.

Draw a sloping line from this point on the vertical line to intersect the horizontal line, somewhere near the right edge of the sheet. Doesn't matter exactly where. The longer this line, the easier.

Now you need to draw a second vertical line to the right of the first one. The place you draw this is where the distance between the sloping line and the horizontal line is exactly equal to the SCALE SIZE of the object of known size (80 HO inches in my case). Measure this carefully. You need to use a T-square (or drafting machine, in my case), or use graph paper to make sure that both vertical lines are really perpendicular to the horizontal line.

You have now established the scaling factor. There's no need to measure it, compute ratios, none of that. The drawing does the computation for you!

Now you can put in the sizes of all the features you want to scale on the first, leftmost vertical line. Widths and heights of doors and windows, wall heights, etc. For each mark on the vertical line, draw a sloping line that intersects at the SAME POINT AS THE ORIGINAL SLOPING LINE. The place where this sloping line intersects the SECOND (scale) line is the scale height of the object.

Be sure to identify the objects you're scaling. I marked the endpoints on the left line with letters, then made a list of letters and what they refer to. If two things on the picture are very close to the same size, you can just lump them together to avoid drawing too many lines. (Maybe make a note that the scale size should be bumped up or down a notch.)

The ASCII drawing below shows this scheme (view in fixed-width font):

| | | | | | | | |\ - | - - - size of thing on picture | \ | | \ | | \ | | \ | | \| | \ - - - scale size of thing | |\ | | \ | | \ | | \ | | \ | | \ - all sloping lines intersect here

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can think of this as the poor man's pantograph ...

NOTES:

The slope of the line in the drawing above is way too steep. Line should have a very shallow slope; this will minimize scaling errors.

The photo you use should be carefully planned. Try to take it as head-on as possible, to minimize parallax errors. In my case, since it is a

4-story building, I'm introducing a "fudge factor" for the size of things near the top, since they're receding away from my vantage point and are therefore larger than they appear.

The size of the printed photo is important, as explained above. Basically, you don't want the left line sizes (from the photo) to be too much larger than the resulting scale sizes. Certainly not 2x larger. This will make this manageable on a sheet of ordinary-size (letter/A4) paper.

Have fun!

• posted

When taking photos, put a red and white striped stick in the photo. Width of stripes equal one foot. Scale the photo using any of several image processing software packages. Done.

• posted

Officer: Sir, I see you are carrying a red and white stick.

You): Um, yes, I am.

Officer: Could you tell me what you intend to do with it, sir?

You: Uh, I'm going to lean it up against some buildings.

Officer: I see....

You: I want to take pictures of the buildings.

Officer: You want to take pictures of buildings with a red and white stick leaning against them?

You: Er, yes.

Officer: Is this is some kind of compulsion?

You: No, no, of course not.

Officer: Then what's the point?

... etc ...

Wolf K.

• posted

Me: "I'd been intending to measure the depth of the stupidity flooding the collective basements of our government officials, but I can see that I'm going to need a longer stick."

• posted

Have your wife or girlfriend stand next to the building.

• posted

Do you have to paint her red and white?

-- Ray

• posted

In message , Christopher A. Lee writes

Just as long as the one doesn't see the photo with the other in it!

(I'll get me coat)

• posted

Only if you're Canadian and she happens to be six feet tall.

Merry Christmas.

~Pete

• posted

If you know your camera's 'parameters': lens focal length, size of the focal plane, etc. you can compute the sizes from images. One of the programs that come with the Model Railroad System will do this computation for you: you just need to define the camera's 'parameters'.

>
• posted

Would be easier of you know the wife's parameters. Apparently, most=20 husbands don't.

Hah!

Wolf K.

• posted

It also assumes that the the wife is actually there and willing to stand there. Also: getting the wife to jump over the fence around the rail yard and walk up to that grubby box car or tool shed or whatever might be problematic. Standing *outside* the fence with one's camera and knowing the camera's 'parameters' is less problematical... :-)

• posted

On 12/6/2010 3:07 PM Robert Heller spake thus:

Butbutbut ... without knowing your exact distance to the subject, how could you possibly compute the size of *anything* in the frame? Basic trigonometry, right?

Sounds unlikely to me ...

• posted

SCALE

Very simple also to make the stick collapsible.

• posted

Only if you're Canadian and she happens to be six feet tall.

Merry Christmas.

~Pete

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, well ...

• posted

Long time ago I built a model loco from a 3/4 front view photo. I knew some basic dimensions, wheel diameters, overall length loading gauge dimensions. Some years later I chanced upon a scale plan - I was so far out I scraped the model.

Greg.P.

• posted

Indeed should she be under the tree come Christmas morning.

• posted

On 12/7/2010 12:41 PM Greg Procter spake thus:

Well, coming from someone who claims they can tell the gross difference between 1:87 and 1:87.1, I think we can safely ignore your experience.

• posted

If you can't discern the difference then why complicate your life and hobby by adding the 0.1???

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.