oil on moving parts?

On 10/18/2007 10:50 AM Jon Miller spake thus:

Alright, I just want to hammer a few nails into that particular coffin ("plastic compatibility").

Folks: it's *bullshit*, plain and simple. Or model-railroading urban legend. Call it what you want.

That's not to say that there may have been a time, back in the Paleolithic Lionel Era, where there actually were some types of plastic that could be harmed (softened, dissolved, deformed) by certains types of oil.

Those days are gone. I challenge anyone to find a type of plastic in use today that can be harmed by any lubricant that a model railroader might apply (assuming that said lubricant is one easily available on the market, not some super-exotic NASA brew or something like that).

No oil will harm your plastic models. (Which is not to say, of course, that you shouldn't be careful about slopping oil all over plastic surfaces; it still is a very good idea to use it *sparingly* and to only get it where it's needed, between the moving parts.)

Reply to
David Nebenzahl
Loading thread data ...

legend. Call it what you want.<

As of today I would totally agree that to be true. There might be a problem if you own _really old_ Athearn or simular engines. MR, I believe, did some soak tests (probably 30+ years ago) and published it. It clearly showed the plastics of that time expanding and cracking with certain types of lube. I certain modern engineering plastics (which most or all gears are made from) can't be hurt with any lub.

Reply to
Jon Miller

Fred Meyer or some other similarly universal store with a locksmith. Graphite makes great lock grease, too.

Reply to
Paul Johnson

Why on earth don't you follow those simple rules yourself?

Reply to
Erik Olsen DK

On 10/20/2007 11:36 AM Erik Olsen DK spake thus:

That's almost as funny as a "speeling flame" post.

Reply to
David Nebenzahl

He should be bottom posted by the demon Vlad for all eternity.

Reply to
Steve Caple

Actually, I have been, fairly consistantly. I wasn't replying to a statement in the post at that point, so no lead-in was necessary there.

Reply to
Paul Johnson

It seems that you haven't read or understood the text at

formatting link
at all.

Reply to
Erik Olsen DK

Why should anyone do that?

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:41:13 +0200, I said, "Pick a card, any card" and "Erik Olsen DK" instead replied:

-- Ray

Reply to
Ray Haddad

Nobody asked you. Go back into your cave, it isn't spring yet.

Reply to
Erik Olsen DK

Does top posting really bother you so much that you turn a valid thread into one of your rants?

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:08:44 +0200, I said, "Pick a card, any card" and "Erik Olsen DK" instead replied:

-- Ray

Reply to
Ray Haddad

Yes, top posting is very annoying indeed. It should be avoided if possible.

Groet, saalut, Wim.

Reply to
wim van bemmel

Cavemen like Ray will just tell you that it isn't possible to avoid top posting.

Reply to
Erik Olsen DK

Stick that man on top of a post, too!

Reply to
Steve Caple

Well, if it bothers you both so much I'll do my very best to avoid it.

Now, do trains run below the rail on your layout?

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:44:29 +0200, I said, "Pick a card, any card" and "Erik Olsen DK" instead replied:

-- Ray

Reply to
Ray Haddad

Most of my trains

run between the rails.

Why do you ask?

Paul

-- Excuse me, I'll be right back. I have to log onto a server in Romania and verify all of my EBay, PayPal, bank and Social Security information before they suspend my accounts.

Working the rockie road of the G&PX

Reply to
Paul Newhouse

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:03:04 -0500, I said, "Pick a card, any card" and snipped-for-privacy@pimin.wan.vpn (Paul Newhouse) instead replied:

Enquiring minds want to know.

-- Ray

Reply to
Ray Haddad

You bottom posting extremist!!

Reply to
Paul Newhouse

On 10/21/2007 5:39 AM Ray Haddad spake thus:

?oot ,tfel ot thgir morf txet daer yllamron osla uoy oD .gnitsop-pot fo tnelaviuqe lacigol eht s'taht esuaceB

Reply to
David Nebenzahl

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:07:09 -0700, I said, "Pick a card, any card" and David Nebenzahl instead replied:

There's no excuse for demanding that anyone top, bottom or middle post. It's entirely up to the person posting. If you want to post at the top, do so. If you prefer the middle, go for it. If you prefer the bottom, do that. But whatever you do, don't ever demand that someone else conform to your way of thinking.

Does top posting really bother you so much that you turn a valid thread into one of your rants?

-- Ray

Reply to
Ray Haddad

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.