If ...

... and only if I was to change to DCC what should I buy?
I note the folks hereabouts appear to rate Lentz quite highly. ZTC is
expensive and IIUC not fully compliant with the standards such as they
are. But what about the recent Guagemaster offering - I do try to buy
British as much as possible.
Also what would I need?
Initially I would be looking to "DCC" a 009 layout, total track is
around 60' (final bits still need to be laid so it's not an exact
figure) and of that the longest run on the "mainline" is around 36' from
buffer stops at one end and around a reversing loop at the other. The
remaining trackwork consists of spurs from the "mainline" (quarry
workings/interchanges/factory yards/small shed/sidings etc).
I can't see that I'd want to run more than two or three engines at once
(single train double or possibly triple headed on very rare occassions)
out of a total proposed stud of 6 to 8 engines.
If the experiment is sucessful I'd then (at a later stage) want to
incorporate the 00 part of my layout (currently DC) - around 200' of
track, the longest runs being two 'ovals' each of around 45', lots of
sidings and a reasonably large engine shed. Anticipated that around 20 -
30 engines could be stabled or run on the layout at any one time.
Reply to
Chris Wilson
Loading thread data ...
If I were in your position, I'd wait until the Bachmann Dynamis is released and read up on reviews and feedback about it before making any decision. It looks like a good system, and has some advances over the 'legacy' systems by the likes of Lenz, Digitrax, etc (I consider the Gaugemaster system to be legacy too...)
But, this is, of course, just in my humble onion...
Ian J.
Reply to
Ian J.
At the end of the day the main differences between the systems available are the features of the controllers/throttles and the networking capabilities they have. So look at the different systems see what best meets your needs.
The Dynamis system does not seem to be that great a leap forward as all the functionality can be done by existing systems. The user interface looks like it might be easier to use which is probably its best selling point.
Chris
Reply to
Chris
"Chris Wilson" wrote
Gaugemaster's Prodigy is not British - it's produced by Model Rectifier Corporation (MRC) in the USA. Some people seem to rate ZTC, but others I've heard have regretted buying it.
I use a Lenz Compact with an add wireless controller from ESU and am impressed, but I wouldn't use this if I wanted to control points - I'd go for the higher spec Set 100.
I think as Ian J suggests, it may be worth waiting to see whether the Bachmann Dynamis delivers all it promises. Whilst it may not be too revolutionary, the promise of wireless control and a very competitive price makes it worth looking at.
Hornby's system seems to want to lock you into their own products and after all the comments I've heard over the past few months (very few of which are favourable) I think I'd give it a very wide berth.
John.
Reply to
John Turner
Against the tide again - Do they 'eck ! and theres been lots of unfair negative spin.
Got round to installing decoders in a couple of shunters and had a few sessions of a few minutes play with my Hornby Elite. Gave a demo to my tot and his school mate of the shunters doing a dance on small oval. Very brave cos first time tried it and these 6 year olds are sometimes a bit critical and always have a short attention span. Shunters going towards each other, then away, one fast one slow, swap speeds, stop one, start it, change speed - everything. Was a doddle, perfect demo, tot wide eyed, lots of wows.
Dual control knobs are excellent, spin the dial and watch them go accelerating to required speed. To anyone waiting for Bachmann system, dont bother, youre wasting months and months (and months...) of playtime.
Cheers, Simon
Reply to
simon
"simon" wrote
I've only reported what I've read. Strange though that very few people in the know are commenting favourably or recommending the Hornby system. That must tell you something!
John.
Reply to
John Turner
Some will *always* buy the cheapest product that will get them by and they will overlook any (if any) disadvantages.
Reply to
Kevin Martin
Chris wrote in news:7NidnWdHKO snipped-for-privacy@bt.com:
...
Cheers to you both, the Bachmann one does appear as though it may turn out a little less expensive.
Reply to
Chris Wilson
"John Turner" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@news.supernews.com:
Fair enough, ZTC appears to expensive and the one time I had a play with it I couldn't see where the added value had been added if you see what I mean.
Plug in will be fine, IIUC, it's possible to have several sockets wired in but perhaps only one or two in use at any one time, as my operating well is only 12'x6' or thereabouts two sockets would suit me fine and as for a wireless system I'd be concerned about reception.
I'm pretty sure that I'd need at least two recievers and whilst the price does look good I'm concerned that by the time I've got all the optional extras - which in reality are not all that optional if you want a fully functioning system the price may skyrocket.
Agreed and already discounted, I've read enough here to decide that. Mind you if they do get their act together by the time I'm ready to purchase and make theirs fully compatable they may score on price.
Reply to
Chris Wilson
Not sure if I've ever seen a fair negative comment - as opposed to a fair negative personal opinion such as dont like the colour - on the Elite, on here.
Not sure I've seen one anywhere else either.
Cheers, Simon
Reply to
simon
If they stick to the one brand, then they'll probably be very happy. It's when you try to mix, e.g., Hornby with a *real* DCC system that the problems become apparent.
MBQ
Reply to
manatbandq
Don't know the situation in Britain, but if you have a chance to try the NCE Power Cab DCC system, do so. Fully NRMA compliant, 10,000 (how many do Hornby have?) addresses, etc etc. And if you decide DCC IS for you and later on uppgrade to a full PowerPro system for your OO layout, the Power Cab plugs into the cab bus and becomes a normal throttle. So you can use it on both.
What more do you need - well, a decoder for each loco is all (maybe a tranny, dont know if they come with them in the UK).
What more do you want - ah, different question - radio throttle, EB3 power distribution unit, sound decoders (luv to see one of those in a OO9 loco - having said that, probably already is somewhere), auto reversers - great for turntables as well as reversing loops, detectors, auxiliary modules etc etc. Now I know the NCE system isnt British, but it aint Aussie either and I bought one :)
Steve Magee Newcastle NSW Aust
Reply to
Steve
Steve wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
Cheers I've actually seen NCE for sale in the UK, what about power boosters or whatever they're called, presumably I'd need a base station but with that length of track would I need an auxillery power station thingie?
Reply to
Chris Wilson
10,000 addresses. Only got 3 decoders so far. Got less than 50 locos. i know its a good idea to over estimate for expansion but thats going it a bit.
Hornby elite has 254 - way more than I will need in the next 10 years. Before which I'll buy the Hornby 'Superior' - or whatever the nth generation one will be called.
Cheers, Simon
Reply to
simon
But purchasers of the Hornby Elite or people what say things like "we all know the Elite is low on amps", when it has 4 amps and bachmann one only has 3. Fair critics are fine and wellcomed, but the spuirious story brigade are naughty.
Cheers, Simon
Reply to
simon
innews: snipped-for-privacy@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
Hi Chris
No, to get up and running, the NCE system is complete - in both Power Pro and Power Cab iterations. If you get the Power Pro, they even throw in a few decoders as well. :) Maybe you will need a transformer, check with your retailer.
Insofar as the number of addresses is concerned, 'taint the total number, but the number itself. With that number of addresses, basically the number on the side of the loco becomes the decoder number. Glance at said number, enter said number into cab, loco is yours. I originally had an early Lenz system with 100 addresses available, having to remember what each loco/decoder number is was a pita. Now I realise that it is BR practice to have 5 numbers on the loco, but unless you buy Zimo (beautiful, but real money!!!) the 4 digit number gives you ease of use. That limitation (254 addresses) of the Hornby system is my main bone of contention with it. Plus apparently there is a conflict with TCS decoders.
And no, you won't need a power booster, unless you really like to sit and look at LEDs on your equipment rack :) My previous HO layout occupied a 24' x 14' shed, and ran comfortably off the one base station Power pro, though I have installed an EB3 to break the layout up into power districts so that a short in one does not shut down the whole layout. Oh and I added a PTB100 to boost power to the programming track for sound equipped locos. Don't REALLY need a Programming Track these days, but a wise thing to have, and I use Decoder Pro on the PC attached to it to make programming so much easier. At the moment, a programming track is the only way to "read" a decoder.
One other point. If I was buying again, I would still definitely consider the NCE, but I am impressed by the new ESU ECOS system, though that is a tad more expensive - about $500Au more than an NCE radio system is here in Aus.
Hope this helps
Steve Magee Newcastle NSW Aust
Reply to
Steve
In message , simon writes
All this "10,000 addresses" (i.e. 0000-9999) thing means is that you can use up to 4 digits to identify your locos, i.e. you can use something memorable derived from the loco's number.
In practice, most DCC systems allow you to have a maximum of 256 locomotives active at any one time.
Reply to
Jane Sullivan
pm, Chris Wils> >> ... and only if I was to change to DCC what should I buy?
Having so many available allows you to use something close to the number on the side of the loco which makes it much easier to operate a layout. How are you going to remember the address for all of your locos?
This just shows Hornby's strange design choices. The normal choice, given the way DCC works, is to limit to standard adressing with up to 127 (limited to 99 "two digit" on some systems) addresses or support extended addressing up to 9999 (hence "4 digit"). Instead, Hornby give you a middling dog's breakfast that is neither one, nor the other.
MBQ
Reply to
manatbandq

Site Timeline

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.