What is it? Set 134

My guesses: #781 looks like the thing my Grandad used to move hot coals around in his forge. #782 I have no idea #783 looks a lot like the thing I have to hold my Dremel Mototool stationary. #784 No Idea #785 Looks like the big ice tongs we used to move ice around in the Cold Storage plant I worked at during my College years.

Dennis

Reply to
TwoGuns
Loading thread data ...

Thanks for taking the time to find that, I appreciate everyone's help in researching the tools that I post each week.

Rob

Reply to
R.H.

781 - A couple of possibilities here, but looking at the leading edge it wouldn't last very long scraping up stuff. So I'll guess it was an Ice Sieve. Used to keep the channel open from chips/debris while cutting/harvesting ice. 785 - Really intrigued me with its diminutive size, so I mucked around till I found the most likely patent number. I think it is 435,590 "Grappling Hook". It was claimed to be used for retrieving objects from water wells. i.e. dippers, buckets, anything that had been dropped in that would stop the well from functioning properly. See:

formatting link

Reply to
Leon Fisk

I figured the 'hold-open' device would not be required if there could be a helper where the pickup was to occur.

Dave

Reply to
spamTHISbrp

Why do you say "probably under water"?

I found this article about logging forests that have been flooded for reservoirs, but this tool is too old for that:

formatting link

Rob

Reply to
R.H.

It does work in a similar manner, maybe the same person got a couple of patents on the same day for two different hooks or he got this patent and then modified the tool and kept the same date. I'm guessing that the one on my site isn't spring loaded, but I'll ask the owner of it, though he's out of town for a couple of days so it will be a while until I get an answer. Thanks for finding that.

Rob

Reply to
R.H.

Five of the six have been answered correctly this week, still not sure about the last one:

780. Audio tape splicer

781. Coal shovel

782. Carpet stretcher

783. Camera lens tripod collar

784. Adding machine

785. I was all set to agree with those who say it's a log grabber, but I also think that the well grappling hook idea has merit, considering the small size of it.

Several new photos and links can be found on the answer page, along with one additional link concerning my latest gadget purchase:

formatting link

Rob

Reply to
R.H.
785 may be a grappling hook for logs, but I respectfully suggest it isn't for use in inaccessible places... Suppose you drop it down a well, or into a river or lake, and it grabs something you can't lift... then what?

Reply to
Charlie Wine

Rob H.:

Really! It doesn't look nearly strong enough to be used for that sort of work. I'd expect those wiry bars to start bending apart the first time it was thrust into a pile of coal.

Reply to
Mark Brader

Then you need part 'B' of the same patent. A grappling device which is used to snag and unlock part 'A' grappling hooks.

Reply to
Patrick Hamlyn

I agree that it isn't strong enough to shovel coal into a fire, I was thinking that it was for removing clinkers, retreiving hot coals to be placed in a foot warmer, or whatever other reason they would have to move hot coal. The wiry bars being used to sift the ashes. One of my tool books has three similar shovels, for coke, potatoes, and ice, but they're all reinforced in the front and have a hand grip on the end of the handle. Since it was marked as being a coal shovel, I'm going to go with that for now; I've looked but haven't been able to find one on the web like it.

Rob

Reply to
R.H.

"R.H." wrote in news:iodTg.6380$OE1.5062 @tornado.ohiordc.rr.com:

Rob, I have to echo what's been said before -- thanks! I look forward to your photos. I am usually in a fog about all of them, but it is a lot of fun. You've posted a couple of things I have sent in. Wish I had more to add.

Thanks again an keep 'em coming! Gary

Reply to
GLM

According to Charlie Wine :

That might be a use for the notches which I commented on. One rope to pull up the weight, and then another to pull up on both notches to open the jaws so you can pull it up.

Enjoy, DoN.

Reply to
DoN. Nichols

R.H. and I (Mark Brader) write:

That's still thrusting it into a pile of coal, though.

Fair enough. It's not like I've ever actually dealt with a coal fire.

Reply to
Mark Brader

Just posted an image of the carpet stretcher from an old Sears catalog where it sold for 37 cents:

formatting link

Reply to
R.H.

Not necessarily under water. We had those things (phone company, early '80s) just as "finger savers". Seems it was a significant source of accidents, people having to manually open the grab jaws over a pole beforehand.

Reply to
dingbat

Hi Rob,

I'm no expert, but most patents are for a method coupled with a design. If you take the time to read the description (it isn't very long) you will see towards the end that it mentions:

"My grab or device is to be constructed of several different sizes to suit wells of different bores or diameter."

I've noticed other patents that end up looking different once being manufactured. The way they work though is the same.

With this thing only being 12 inches tall I seriously doubt it was ever used to lift poles or logs as has been suggested. It simply would not be heavy/strong enough to do that. Shoot you could easily have it sitting on the supper table as a center/conversation piece. I don't think people have noticed it isn't very big...

Reply to
Leon Fisk

Hi Rob,

After studying the answer extra images, I think that there may have been a spring at one time. I think it would have been a pull spring (can't think of the proper term) with this design though, rather than the original compression spring shown on the suggested patent page.

Take a look at my doctored image where I highlighted in yellow where I suspect a spring should go:

formatting link

I would be curious to know approximately how much this thing weighs too, when you get a chance to ask more about it.

I did some more patent searching and was surprised with how many "grapple" devices there were for fishing out items from wells. The aforementioned patent is the only one even close to resembling the item in question though. At least that I've found...

Reply to
Leon Fisk

SNIP

Hey Rob,

Maybe not on the web, but I have one like it in my back-yard as a decorative item.. Bought it for 2 bucks at an auction, so I've no idea either.

Take care.

Brian Lawson, Bothwell, Ontario.

Reply to
Brian Lawson

According to Leon Fisk :

[ ... ]

[ ... ]

Agreed.

I did -- which is why I did not suggest it was for serious log or telephone pole manipulation. It would suffice for fireplace logs, but would probably be overkill for the purpose -- unless they were at the bottom of a pit and otherwise difficult to access.

I like the "recover things from wells" description.

Enjoy, DoN.

Reply to
DoN. Nichols

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.