62.5g vs. APCP

shockwaveriderz · 2006-09-25T20:07:13+00:00

I am slighlty confused. which is not unusal for me. anyway I have a question:If the court decides in our favor that APCP is not an explosive, how does/will that effect the 62.5 g nprm 968 final rule due to go into effect 10/10/06?The ATF states the following in its final rule:SUMMARY: The Department of Justice is amending the regulations of the Bureauof Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to clarify that therequirements of part 555 do not apply to model rocket motors consisting ofammonium perchlorate composite propellant, black powder, or othersimilar low explosives, containing no more than 62.5 grams of total propellantweight, and designed as single-use motors or as reload kits capable ofreloading no more than 62.5 grams of propellant into a reusable motor casing.In other words, the ATf is staing that model rocket motora made from Bp or APCP less than 62.5 is UNREGULATED ie EXEMPTED from ATF oversight.So what about a 62.6 g APCP rocket motor? Its over the 62.5 theshold, but the APCP itself is not an explosive? Since APCP is not an explsive, then it should not matterwhat size of propellant grain I use? Yes? No? Maybe?terry deannar 16158

Sep 25, 2006 21 Replies

Rate this thread:

Darren J Longhorn 19 years ago

Clearly, you never saw my three legged cat fight.

Vote

lizardqueen 19 years ago

could very well end

Vote

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required