[conclusions]

Dec 19, 2003 156 Replies

This is exactly my impression also.

-dave w

I repeatedly said and you repeatedly ignored I was talking about NAR/TRA as AHJ's for NFPA regs as components of actual state laws. THEY are the problem.

Ignore it again now too?

I received a letter from ATF (have it somewhere) circa 1997 that said in effect. We have no records of issued exemptions, so please attach any exemptions you have been issued to your next application so we have a copy too. I laughed my ass off.

It is no wonder to me DOT is the same way, or at least was.

Jerry

That's not what it says.

can you get 240ns out of 125 grams?

I'll answer my own question. yes kosdon had a H135 that did 240ns on 112g shockie B)

It is TRA who is circumventing the rules. I cite them. I follow them. I get rejected.

Jerry

and of course ACS-Reaction Labs had a 116 g 240ns H170....... shockie B)

From Merriam Webster online:

Shop 2 a : a building or room stocked with merchandise for sale : STORE b also shoppe /'shäp/ : a small retail establishment or a department in a large one offering a specified line of goods or services

So it is your assertation that you:

i. were directly told that by the DOT agent and ii. were directly told that by Jerry and iii. personally heard the exchange

Look, I'm not a fool. If you are willing to back your statement up in pen and ink (i.e. legal and binding) then I'll admit that I was wrong, apologize to the group publically, and shut my mouth on the issue of JI. But, if you are unwilling to do so, then I can only assume that it was actually "D".

Please advise how you wish to proceed, because one of us is facing a rather large plate of crow and I'd like to know who.

PhilipD (Still not Duane)

Jerry,

Back off for a minute and let Dave and I settle this one. I have tossed down the gauntlet at Dave's feet. Now, it is his turn. He can either pick it up and make me look like a fool publically, or hang his head and walk away in shame.

Philip

"Jerry Irv> That is directly false.

I'd say it's more "the rules" were written by someone who was intent on "circumventing" Jerry's particular manufacturing approach.

Like what?

-dave w

Ray,

Read the response before replying, please.. The analogy had nothing to do with permits or the lack thereof. The analogy was about getting an life altering anal probe despite of one's innocence or guilt.

Wanna see it in action first hand? Go to a pay phone and anonymously phone the police. Report that the resident at your home address is beating his children violently every night. You're not of course, so all will be fine once they see that in person. Afterwards, report back on how that affected your life. Note: If you do not have kids, report that drugs are being sold at that location. The effect will be similar enought to be suitable for your report.

Philip

It would be an interesting experiment if someone playing with AP wouldn't mind wasting a grain or 2.

Joel. phx

The real question is at what point does the humidity become a problem?

I know you are but what am I?

Grow up.

Joel. phx

I know the answer. I told/invited errortech to buy propellant from me (borrow a cup of sugar, neighbor?) immediately after the fire. They would have had about

1000% more and 90% sooner. They didn't want me to become TRA/NAR "blessed".

Jerry

THATis a good analogy.

P.S. Don't do it!!! Jerry said so.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required