david: the 62.5 g limit alluded to in CPSC applies only to minors....It does
not apply to adults.
the limitations of power and the labeling requirements, that are required by
the CPSC for sales of model rocket motors, are limited to 62.5 if they are
indeed minors...
THe labeling and marking requirements of the CPSC were put in place to get
model rocket motors exempt from the FULL labeling and marking requirements
of the FBSA Federal Banned Substances Act..
The labeling and marking required by the CPSC is to protect children not
adults.
The CPSC could care less if you are 18 (an adult) and buying model rocket
motors exceeding 62.5g.
This is where NFPA 1125 kicks in... the NAR/TRA enshrined into NFPA 1125 the
62.5 g limit as the upper limit for model rocket motors.....they could have
chosen 125g...... The reason they didn't was for "compatability" with the
CPSC ,even though thisd 62.5g only applies to minors, not adults. What I
am trying to say is there are "minimum" standards set by the CPSC that 62.5
and < model rocket motors have to adhere to, to be sold to minors. . If
anybody wanted to create > 62.5g , a 75 g, a 100g, 125g "model rocket
motors" they would probably have to be called something else, like large
model rocket motors. And the manufacturer of such could require that they be
sold from "behind the counter" to adults only with proper id....
This is what AT/RCS does with their 18/24/29mm BCDEFG motors. Initially they
were actually banned by the CPSC due to their metallic construction. Well
actually the CPSC slapped AT/RCS with a "restrainig order" prohibiting their
sale, UNTIL AT/RCS provided documentation that they would be sold "behind
the counter" with proper id, to insure the purchaser was indeed an adult 18
yrs old and not a minor.
As we all know, these motors are sold out in the open, to minors in most
states and most hobbies stores could care less about enforcing CPSC orders.
But this isn't AT/RCS fault nor responsibility unless of course the store in
question is perhaps a registered AT/RCS dealer. AS a registered AT/RCS with
protected territory, AT/RCS could draw up the franchise agreement such that
it specifically states that motors > 62.5 would never be sold to minors
directly. They could always of course sell them "indirectly" through
parents,guardians, etc over 18.
I can only assume the reason they did not define a model rocket motor as
125g max was that Estes and other manufactureres would then be responisble
for additional testing for the larger model rocket motors, if these motors
were to be sold to minors, again with the limited marking and labeling
requirements.
If model rocket motors do not conform to the CPSC requirements. then they
cannot be sold to minors.....
hth shockie B)
wrote:
FBSA should be FHSA Federal Hazardous Substances Act,,
See back before 1973, model rocket motors were considered hazardous
substances (FOR MINORS ONLY!!!) and to be able to sell them on the Open
Shelf (hobby stores, toy shops, and now Wal-Mart,etc) Estes was required to
submit their model rocket motors to testing by the CPSC.
In the testing that was done by the CPSC(or was provided to the CPSC by
Estes) , it was determined that these motors behaved as flammable substances
and were also presurrized containers. That being the case, for Estes to
legally sell them to minors, they had to agree with the CPSC for a certain
minimal amount of labeling and marking of the motors and instruction sheets
that came with them. By doing this, Estes received an EXEMPTION from the
CPSC for having to undergo the FULL labeling and marking requirements that
flammable substances would normally would be required.
The FHSA details these minmal labeling and marking requirements verus the
full requirements.
Its that simple. Its for Retail Sales to minors.
shockie B)
wrote:
And they also can't be put on retail store shelves either , even if sold
only to adults.
They must be kept away from the public access.
their is a bit of history you are not up to speed on ;-)
almax:
AT/RCS RMS reloads in the BCDEFG levels do not conform to the CPSC
regulations for model rocket motors, but they are sold legally, (supposed to
be behind the counter or sold only to adults). I have a copy of the 1993
CPSC letter to AT/RCS which lifted that injunction against them selling the
RMS because they had metallic casings and obviously didn't comply to the
model rocket regs as far as construction was concerned or total impulse(in
the case of the G) was concerned.
The CPSC issued an enforcement injunction against AT/RCS selling RMS or G.
Why? Because of the metallic cases and the total impulse of G motors.
AT/RCS tried to get the CPSC to amend 1500.85. The CPSC refused to amend
1500.85. But CPSC did allow and continues to allow AT/RCS to sell AP BCDEFG
motors to the adult public.
from this letter:
"Aerotech has indicated that it intends to market these motors to
individuals who are 18 years of age or older(only), thus removing them (the
motors in question) from the purview of the (CPSC) FHSA's banning
provisions. "
The letter also states it is the responsibility of AT/RCS to ensure that
these model rocket motors are only sold to adults . SO AT/RCS dealers
control access to these motors . SO yes they may not be on the retail
shelves, but they can be behind the store shelves or they cna be placed in a
locked display case, which is the way I normally see them. I have also seen
G class SU motors openly out on retail shelves in some hobby stores down
thru the years.
shockie B)
CPSC regulates what can be sold to minors. That's why G motors are labeled
as restricted to those 18 and over. CPSC never changed their definition to
include G motors back in 1985.
The BATFE wants those same limits to apply to adults :-(
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
>>> To reply, remove the TRABoD! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle: http://nira-rocketry.org/LeadingEdge/Phantom4000.pdf
www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/ www.nira-rocketry.org www.nar.org
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it
with religious conviction. -- Blaise Pascal
As an interesting side note to this whole discussion, I went to the CPSC
website to try and find some information.
Imagine my surprise when they indicate that they do NOT have authority
over alcohol, tobacco, and firearms (among other things), as there are
other government agencies that handle those sorts of things. So, since
motors are none of these, they feel compelled to regulate them, but then
the BATFE also does so (even though they are not A,T, or F), and we end
up with double regulation!!!
David Erbas-White
The CPSC can ban anything they wish with a stroke of the pen as a haz
substance.
they really were ready to shut down AP hobby motors at one time, and the
62.5 concession was given to them to simmer down now.
compromise makes the world go round.
almax:
enough with the crptic remarks, tell us what you know to fill in the blanks.
I think BAN with the stroke of a pen is to much... don't they deal with
injunctions and such? which at least leaves the BANEE with recourse? Sorta
like what happened with RMS in the early 90's?
shockie B)
I just checked the Report On Proposals (ROP) and Report On Comments
(ROC) documents for the 2002 revision cycle on the NFPA web site. From
those documents it appears that the 62.5 gram restriction was already in
the 1998 edition of the code. The ROP and ROC documents for that
revision cycle are not available online.
I don't have a copy of the 1998 edition. I purchased copies of the 2002
editions of NFPA 1122 and 1127 and I have a copy of the TRA safety code
which is the 1995 edition (the first I think) of NFPA 1127. The 1995
version from TRA doesn't have the 62.5 gram limit.
--
David W. Schultz
http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz /
The safe distance for H hasn't been 50' since the original interim / draft
NFPA 1127. And their reason for changing it from 50' to 100' was nothing
more than the reason that the BATFE uses to decide what's onthe explosives
list. They made it up.
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
>>> To reply, remove the TRABoD! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle: http://nira-rocketry.org/LeadingEdge/Phantom4000.pdf
www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/ www.nira-rocketry.org www.nar.org
We need to ensure that actions by our government uphold the
principles of a democratic society, accountable government and
international law, and that all decisions are taken in a manner
consistent with the Constitution.
NO. The line remains if you are launching at a site that has a Model
Rocket limit in the land use and/or fire authority permit.
F101 motors are not model rocket motors. More than 80 Newtons of
average thrust.
That is why FSI renamed their F100 as the F80 near the end of their
existence. They never were 80 or 100 Newtons of average thrust, but
they thought it sounded "cool" and "marketable". At some point the
legality of shipping or certifying them came up and they changed them.
-Fred Shecter NAR 20117
david: it looks like you didn't get any clear answers so I will try:
from the NAR MR Safety Code:
Size. My model rocket will not .... contain more than 125 grams (4.4 ounces)
of propellant or 320 N-sec (71.9 pound-seconds) of total impulse.
IF your model rocket has >113 g of propellant it becomes a LARGE MR and FAA
notice is required.
http://www.nar.org/NARmrsc.html
TRA:
The TRA Safet Code is NFPA 1127 .It has nothing to do with model rocketry so
they have no line
NFPA 1122:
4.5 Model Rocket Power Limits. A model rocket's installed motor(s) shall
produce a total impulse of no more than 320 N-s (72 lb-s).
4.8.2 Type G motors with an installed total impulse of more than 80 N-s(18
lb-s), but not more than 160 N-s (36 lb-s), shall be permitted to be used by
individuals 18 years old and older.
NFPA 1125:
3.3.26.4 Model Rocket Motor. A model rocket motor that has a total impulse
of no greater than 160 N-sec, an average thrust of no greater than 80 N, and
a propellant weight of no greater than 2.5 g (2.2 oz).
CSPC:
(ii) Contain no more than 62.5 grams
(2.2 ounces) of propellant material and
produce less than 80 newton-seconds
(17.92 pound seconds) of total impulse
with thrust duration not less than 0.050
second.
CSFM:
12520. Model rocket engine
"Model rocket engine" means a commercially manufactured, non-reusable rocket
propulsion device which is constructed of a nonmetallic casing and solid
propellant, wherein all of the ingredients are self-contained so as not to
require mixing or handling by the user and which have design and
construction characteristics determined by the State Fire Marshal to provide
a reasonable degree of safety to the user.
12565. Classification as model rocket engines
All fireworks or toy propellent devices containing pyrotechnic compositions
examined by the State Fire Marshal and found by him to come within the
definition of "model rocket" or "model rocket engine" in Section 12519 or
12520, respectively, shall be classified as model rocket engines.
6) Model Rocket Motor. The same as a model rocket engine, as defined in
Health and Safety Code Section 12520. Model rocket motors shall not produce
more than 160 Newton-seconds of total impulse power.
Perhaps somebody can devise a table showing what is a MR according to whom?
HTH
shockie B)
Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.