You may NOT recall the reason TRA got onto the NFPA committee in the first place was NAR was rewriting NFPA-1122 to "write out" TRA members "exemptions".
NAR was militantly against HPR at the time.
After TRA joined NFPA they simply helped NAR kill all general exemptions for regular people they could. Mandatory consumer certs for access is one example.
Note how adding that agregious provision in no way disuaded ATF from going their own way.
I posted the date of publication in my initial quote of the code. I posted it again yesterday. As for your "reference", all you've done is post your opinions. You have not posted even a single sentence from the code itself! I post cites, you post BS.
Of course you can. But you have to do it legally. Merely saying, "I'm a corporation" doesn't make it so.
industry.
You may not need a business license, but you do have to be legally incorporated.
For manufacturing rocket propellent? I don't believe that.
By whom, and when? All of the manufacturers currently in business have been required by ATF to have ATF permits.
Cite?
Again, what is your cite to support this claim?
I have, I cited NFPA code, which most if not all states have adopted. You haven't provided a single cite.
goods?
Irrelevant. Stick to the topic.
More irrelevance.
And you think that manufacturing propellent does not??
What would Fred Wallace do?
Perhaps he would point out that you're the only one here with a proven track record of fraud, lying and violating federal regulations, and as such you have no credibility.
Nope. Do I need one? Possibly. Do I care? No. That's the difference between us -- you want everyone to believe you're legal when you operate without permits.
It's like speeding. I do it all the time, but you won't see me telling people it's legal to speed. It IS illegal. Nor do I blame my speeding tickets on the Auto Club. p
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.