Best 1/72 armor kit manufacturers

Hi; Does anyone have an opinion on the best manufacturers of 1/72 armor? I've noticed that there are a number of them and before I buy one from each company to try I thought I would get some input from people who build them.

Thanks;

ron

Reply to
ronh
Loading thread data ...

Yes, with over 3,500 kits and models of vehicles (military and civilian) databased in the ESM 72 files in 1/72-1/76 scale I guess that there are certainly are a number of them. :-)

Best of the lot are probably the ESCI kits, some are currently being re-issued by Italeri. Revell does some really good modern vehicles. Watch out for their WWII stuff as some are ex-Matchbox kits of varying quality. There are also tons of cast resin 1/72 vehicles out there of almost anything that you could want.

Tom

Reply to
Maiesm72

Revell of Germany - make sure it's their own kit. Anything and everything they have released as their own and new kit the last 3 or 4 years or so is superb. This includes a lot of modern tanks, but also the Panzer III and IV, and the Sturmgeschutz IV.

There are a few eastern European manufacturers who make excellent kits, such as Mirage - their 7TP and Vickers E are excellent. UM - a lot of very good WWII and earlier Soviet tanks.

Anders skrev i meddelandet news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com...

Reply to
Anders Svennevik

The PST (?) Eastern Europe range is pretty good. They have multiple variants of items on the KV and T-34 chassis, and they are serious about what is required for a particular variant. This is important as WWII armor tended to be mix and match. Kim M

Operation American Freedom-Where is our regime change?

Reply to
Royabulgaf

Yes RoG....but look on the side of the box, where it says what country it is made in, if it says Japan it is a reboxed Hasegawa, The best ones are made in Poland or Korea.

Reply to
Scott A. Bregi

The Revell Stug IV is a piece of crap. I think single road wheels instead of doubles is more than enough to qualify any model of a vehicle based on the Pz III or IV chassis as garbage. It turned me off of Revell in a bad way and I refused to touch any of their kits for years. It was only after hearing here about the quality of some of their kits released after the Stug, that I started buying any of their new WWII kits such as the Tig I, Panther and Cromwell.

Reply to
Tim Marshall

PST kits are nice and do fill out a nice range, but I find their kits are a nightmare to build. A lot of parts which must be drilled or forget it, brittle plastic with small things that break easily and (great for scratch builders) a huge number of redundant parts. Their ISU-122 and 152 kits, for example, all come with exactly the same parts but different directions and box art.

I have some pics of PST kits on my site (be nice, I'm a wargamer) at:

formatting link
Click on Soviet Infantry & heavy Armour, Soviet Infantry & Armour as well as some "in action" pictures at the link at the top of the page for "game 1".

Reply to
Tim Marshall

Anders, sorry if it seemed like I jumped on you my last post. It's just the Revell Stug was a big, big disappointment to me especially as my kids were so excited they'd found 4 of them to give Dad as a Christmas present a few years back. Here is a shot (I'm a wargamer, so don't nitpick) of one of them that illustrates the wheel problem:

formatting link

Reply to
Tim Marshall

I apparently typed a bit too fast, should have been Stug III, released this year to good reviews.

"Tim Marshall" skrev i meddelandet news: snipped-for-privacy@Gunner.Sabot.Spam.On.Loaded.FIRE...

No problem.

Anders

Reply to
Anders Svennevik

Ron,

Check out my website. I have reviews of representative kits from every manufacturer currently producing 1/72nd scale AFV kits.

-Doug

-- Doug Chaltry "On The Way!" - 1/72nd Scale Armor Modeling on the World Wide Web.

formatting link

Reply to
Doug Chaltry

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.