DWGgateway form Solidworks

This has to have ADesk just fuming! I see this just as knight takes rook in the strategy to out maneuver the competition. This in theory should decrease Adesk's cash flow if ACAD users no longer need to upgrade for compatibility reasons. They now need to justify to upgrade based on the limited software advances, 2D can just go so far.
Here the quick story in March's Solidworks Express...
Free software download lets AutoCAD users open and edit any DWG file using any version of AutoCAD
DWGgateway is the first free software download that gives AutoCAD® users universal DWG compatibility without having to upgrade to the latest version of AutoCAD software. Download DWGgateway today and eliminate the need to upgrade AutoCAD licenses just to be able to share work and collaborate with other AutoCAD users.
To download:
formatting link

Full story:
formatting link

PS Interesting enough, AutoDesk did not have any booth at the national engineering and design show in Chicago this week, maybe it was an off year.
Reply to
Keith Streich
Loading thread data ...
rook in the strategy to out maneuver the competition. This in theory should decrease Adesk's cash flow if ACAD users no longer need to upgrade for compatibility reasons. They now need to justify to upgrade based on the limited software advances, 2D can just go so far.
using any version of AutoCAD
users universal DWG compatibility without having to upgrade to the latest version of AutoCAD software. Download DWGgateway today and eliminate the need to upgrade AutoCAD licenses just to be able to share work and collaborate with other AutoCAD users.
When do we get this capability for SolidWorks files? ;>
Reply to
cdubea
It could be done for SW also, but that could cut their cash flow. It's ironic that if one uses SW2001 or SW2003 and attempts to use a part downloaded from
formatting link
which was created with a new SW version, they are screwed. No way to obtain a smart part.
Keith Streich wrote:
rook in the strategy to out maneuver the competition. This in theory should decrease Adesk's cash flow if ACAD users no longer need to upgrade for compatibility reasons. They now need to justify to upgrade based on the limited software advances, 2D can just go so far.
using any version of AutoCAD
users universal DWG compatibility without having to upgrade to the latest version of AutoCAD software. Download DWGgateway today and eliminate the need to upgrade AutoCAD licenses just to be able to share work and collaborate with other AutoCAD users.
When do we get this capability for SolidWorks files? ;>
Reply to
Keith Streich
The cash cow...
What if they offered a reduced subscription for a tool that would translate future versions into whatever your current versions is? Backwards compatability shouldn't be free. Somebody should pay for it. Maybe it shouldn't be the people who are on the current version and don't need it.
Just a thought. I'm not sure I'm right, but the idea is interesting. If I'm on subscription, I don't want my fees paying for backwards compatability with those who refuse to upgrade.
Or maybe it should be dependent on the business relationships involved between users. The reverse translation tool could be an add-in for either user. The vendor has to suck it up and pay the difference. Of course, in that model, we should also have to pay for all the translators we already have. Or is that situation significantly different?
Reply to
Dale Dunn
And it seems to work....DWG Gateway that is.
Keith Streich wrote:
rook in the strategy to out maneuver the competition. This in theory should decrease Adesk's cash flow if ACAD users no longer need to upgrade for compatibility reasons. They now need to justify to upgrade based on the limited software advances, 2D can just go so far.
using any version of AutoCAD
users universal DWG compatibility without having to upgrade to the latest version of AutoCAD software. Download DWGgateway today and eliminate the need to upgrade AutoCAD licenses just to be able to share work and collaborate with other AutoCAD users.
formatting link
national engineering and design show in Chicago this week, maybe it was an off year.
Reply to
P.
Since they didn't have a booth at the show, one could wonder, perhaps, that they ( autodesk ) were not busily coding sldprtgateway .
One can always hope that was the case.
Reply to
Brian
Keith,
I think it is something of an "apples to oranges" comparison.
2D data is MUCH simpler to convert to older releases. Even AutoCAD has limitations in providing data interoperability between releases (and products). The implementation of "proxy objects" in AutoCAD is "cosmetic" approach to solving this issue.
If SW was to support saving 3D files in older versions, would you accept a mixed model of parametric and dumb surfaces and solids? Where would you draw the line? What if a simple "older" feature (i.e. boss-extrude) was dependent on a "newer" feature (i.e. - a filled surface)? Would you accept limited parametric editing capabilities? What if the "mixed" data was returned to a newer version of SW? Should the data become fully parametric again? The list of problems converting the data is almost endless.
This is the problem with the "proxy objects" approach. There are many ways to "corrupt" the newer data, rendering it limited in usefulness.
Anyone have an opinion on how this should be implemented?
If you examine the parts on 3D Content Central, you will find that they don't incorporate many of the features and design intent that SolidWorks supports.
I think it is safe to say that SolidWorks has code to convert newer files to older releases. I just don't think they have found a reliable way to convert new features to old parametric features, not to mention back again.
My 2 cents.
John
Reply to
John Picinich
if i could do backward conversions of library (or collab files) i would probably load up and use sw2000. the inherent speed would more than make up for any added features since then, and i could easily use old $300 computers. obviously, this capability wouldn't come from swx!
just a thought. bill
Reply to
bill a

Site Timeline

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.