My employer doesn't currently produce assemblies and drawings of complete pieces of equipment, but I'm pushing them in that direction as the lack of proper documentation causes problems.
A complete system (we make textile creels) comprises upto 2000 repeated positions, but this is broken down into 3 sections, and each section is sub-divided into 7-10 "frames". It is therefore easy and logical to divide this up into sub-assemblies.
However, ultimately, there will be a heck of a lot of geometry on screen. When working with a full layout, we aren't interested in the fasteners, bearings etc that are present in the sub-assys's or sub-sub-assy's. My thought is to create a simplified config of each sub-assy, with only the major components visible. This config will be used in the higher level assys. The default config with everything visible will be used if a sub-assys drawing is required.
My first question is, I'll need a top-level BOM that lists ALL components at all levels, so does that rule out suppressing components in sub-assys? I used to use I-Deas, and it had the BOM option of "include supressed instances" - can SWX do this?
Some of the sub-assys will only be created to simplify managing the geometry and speed up solving of mates. Is it possible to exclude these "dummy" sub-assys from the BOM, but still include the components they comprise?
Is it worth also creating a simplified config of parts, that have internal features, fillets etc suppressed. Again, the default config would be used for the part drawing, but the simplified would be used in assemblies. Does anyone work this way?
TIA John Harland SWX2004