What was the most ugly?

The GP7 was Dilworth's knock-off of Alco's RS-2 which had been in production three full years while EMD was suffering from craniorectal inversion.

CH

Reply to
Captain Handbrake
Loading thread data ...

And your point is..........?

Reply to
Captain Handbrake

Sounds reasonable. The structural carbody DOES have advantages in pure performance. In practice, however, it was a big maintenance headache. Here in the USA, where labor costs were always higher, the concept quickly became non-competitive.

And, while the cut down BL2's had structural problems, this was not much (if any) issue with the "F" units.

It's not basically a bad idea ... but it carries a price, and one that railroads in the USA decided not to pay. In retrospect, most things designed for pure performance are impractical.

Dan Mitchell ============

Reply to
Daniel A. Mitchell

Sure, the Alco RS's came out earlier. Alco was ahead of the game here (but not in a lot of other issues).

GM was heavily involved in the 'not invented here' state of mind. While they were no doubt aware of the RS's, I think their GP7 owed more to their own NW5 and BL2 than the Alco products ... even though they were of the same type. Both showed that EMD was aware of the problems and issues of a road switcher design, and were working on it, but it took them a while to get their act together.

Dan Mitchell ============

Reply to
Daniel A. Mitchell

I'm giving you some possibly interesting information, widening your knowledge base, broadening your horizons. The same reason I read this ng.

Regards, Greg.P.

Reply to
Gregory Procter

The Europeans carried that cost.

In Europe, the requirement was to accelerate trains to operating speed reasonably quickly so as to move the maximum tonnage over a given stretch of track rather than to drag heavy trains at slow speeds. It was the reason the Germans and French developed their Diesel hydraulics (V200 class - 2700hp within 87 tonnes) They worked well in Europe where speed over short distances was required but failed in Britain where they wanted speed over long distances and in the US with heavy loads over long distances - the gearboxes just weren't up to the accumulation of heat under sustained heavy use. (plus all the other factors of oddball design far from home)

Reply to
Gregory Procter

take a tour of some of these monsters:

formatting link
or these (expand the links on the left hand side to select for the different categories):
formatting link
some more. Some are so ugly they are cute:
formatting link
more:
formatting link

Reply to
me

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.