Hornby 34045 Ottery St. Mary - a (mainly favourable) assessment

Feb 02, 2007 6 Replies

I now have my 34045 Ottery St. Mary, (which will become 34042 Dorchester this weekend). In general, I'm very pleased with it.



The detail is incredible, running is superb, and the finish is excellent. Placed next to unrebuilt 34041 Wilton it is very evident how Hornby have improved such things as lining in recent years.



However, the rather obvious fact that the upper boiler section is a separate moulding has been inherited from the rebuilt Merchant Navy. I haven't got one of the latter but my impression is that the gaps at the smokebox / boiler and boiler / firebox joints are even more pronounced than in the illustrations which I recall of the Hornby rebuilt MN.



What is significant is that the box illustration, which is presumably of an actual model, *must* have been touched-in as there's no sign of thes rather obvious gaps.



These joints are at the limit of my personal tolerance, and I suspect that if I can match Hornby's shade of BR loco green I'm in for some fiddly work with Milliput and touch-in paint.



Also, I do *not* like the fixed trailing truck. Fine, the lower firebox / ashpan and associated pipework is modelled in incredible detail but flangeless wheels went out many years ago by my standards. I've fitted the flanged wheels but I can't see there being sufficient sideplay for reliable running on even modest radii.



I'm guessing that I'll end up doing some fairly radical surgery to remove the inside bearing slot for the trailing wheels in the cast mainframe and mounting a pin-point axle in the truck dummy bearings; (drilling these centrally will be fun)! The silly thing is that the trailing truck has a conventional pivot bearing and screw but is locked solid by a second screw immediately behind it.



It's my guess that it was originally designed to pivot but was fixed to allow the pipework which wraps round the back corner of the truck to be modelled. I'll sacrifice a small section of this for the sake of a functional truck.



Despite these two winges it's a good model; I just feel that the boiler seam gaps are unnecessary, (they don't seem to be evident on the rest of Hornby's range), and I believe the fixed pony truck to be 'a step too far'.



Regards, John Isherwood.



Somebody is bound to be along any minute now and rubbish it.

Kevin

It's a prime example of a very beautiful model, with exquisite detail to a very high standard...

...only to be let down by such weird (and IMHO stupid) design choices...

Ian J.

"Kevin" wrote

Not me mate, I think it's a nice model, but sadly spoilt for the now customary ha'p'orth of tar, as described by John Isherwood.

I've no requirement for any Pacific locos, let alone those which ran exclusively south of the Thames, and therefore will not be adding any to my loco stud. Now if Hornby (or Bachmann) decided to produce quality models of the ex-LMS 3F and 4F 0-6-0 goods tender locos rather than going head-to-head with Stanier 4-6-0s, I'd certainly bag a brace!

I have added one of the recently re-issued (ex-Lima) Met-Camm class 101 dmus, and sadly this is also spoilt by carelessness at the planning stage. Still the rather quaint mis-match of buffers is relatively simple to rectify, but why oh why is it necessary?

John.

Blimey, three complementary messages about a Hornby model, that must be a first.

Kevin

My message re the rebuilt WC/BB definitely wasn't intended to be complimentary...

However to the M7, I can honestly say hats off to Hornby for a truly beautiful model, I can't fault it (though I'm sure that there are *probably* some things wrong with it, I certainly don't know what they are)

Ian J.

I have both Plymouth and "Ottery". Excellent locos, pull well, although Plymouth wasn't quite so well put together - may have been rushed to get them out before Christmas - as one or two small fittings were loose, and the front bogie derailed until the mounting bracket was adjusted. I also don't like the fixed rear pony truck. At the front end, the AWS protector and the steam heat pipe will foul the bogie if not fitted carefully - I have ground off the slight semi- circular projection on the bogie.

Colin

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required