Gotta weird application in which I need to weld 99% pure Cobalt to itself!
Called Washington Alloys and three other majors and stumped them all...all
generally said the same ..."brittle", "never heard of Cobalt that pure!",
etc.
The end application involves running electrical current through the
Cobalt.....rather cryptic, I know, but that's all my client is willing to
tell me at this time! Obviously, an experimental effort at this point! The
joint design is basically a 1/2" X 1/2" solid stock, 6" dia. ring, butt
welded to itself ...no loads, i.e, sheer, deflection, etc. will be applied
to it!
Based on Cobalts' crack sensitivity, I'm thinking of skipping any GTAW, GMAW
or SMAW processes involving filler metal and try using a 56% silver bearing
brazing alloy and whippin' out the ol' torch???
Anyone have any welding/joining experience with such Cobalts this pure?
TIA,
Harp
Is this what your client wants? I mean: if they intend to run
electricity through pure cobalt, surely they don't want another alloy
in the middle.
About crack sensitivity: can't cracks be avoided by carefully control
workpiece temperature? If you must weld, this maybe your best option.
Think electron beam welding.
It is excellent for crack prone materiels.
Laser welding has also come a long way, and is now being used to weld
many "unweldable" aluminum alloys, like 2024.
Just had a "expert" tell me that cobalt that pure is equal to Monel 400 and
could/should be welded with Monel 60. I haven't looked up Monel's specs
yet....anyone know?
TIA,
Harp
I have not had any direct experience with pure cobalt. I do have some
limited experience with cobalt alloys, such as Stellite (chrome and
carbon in cobalt). I would assume that the reactions you are getting
from others (too brittle, etc.) are based on their knowledge of cobalt
alloys rather than pure cobalt. Here are some facts about pure cobalt
(99.9%) [taken from ASM Metals Handbook, 9th ed., Vol. 2, p 725-726],
which are the basis of some of my tentative opinions on this matter:
Tensile strength in the as-cast condition: about 34 ksi (thousand
pounds per inch) [note that this is about 1/2 to 2/3 the value for
mild steel, which would be about 50-60 ksi, depending on the grade)
Tensile strength in the annealed condition: about 37 ksi (i.e. not
much change)
Tensile strength in the swaged condition: about 100 ksi.
Pure cobalt has an HCP crystal structure.
Melting temperature of 2723 deg F (1495 deg C).
Electrical conductivity is about 28% of pure copper
Thermal conductivity is 69 W/m2K, i.e. about 20% of pure copper.
Specific heat is 414 J/kgK, i.e. about the same as copper and steel.
From the above, I draw the following conclusions:
1) The material can be cold-worked to a high degree, based on the
information about tensile strength in the swaged condition.
2) The material is likely to be ductile, since it is an essential pure
HCP crystal structure plus the large amount of swaging that appears to
be possible. Brittle alloys would not show such increases in strength
upon swaging (you really cannot swage them at all...think cast iron as
an example).
3) The melting temperature, electrical conductivity, specific heat,
and thermal conductivity show similarities to steel alloys, i.e. there
is nothing highly unusual that would prevent using conventional
welding techniques.
Of course, the question is what would you weld it with? Could you do
this weld autogenously (i.e. without filler or using excess material
as the filler)? I do not know how the material would react but it
seems to be a reasonable possibility. Looking at a couple of phase
diagrams, it appears that either pure copper or pure nickel could be
used with a resulting weld metal that might be acceptable, but this is
just a best guess. Any way you do this, the weld is likely to be
somewhat harder and less ductile than the pure cobalt. Also note that
these two fillers are pure copper and pure nickel (an "unalloyed"
nickel filler metal is commercially available, see Inco's Nickel 200
filler metal, but it may be hard to get routinely). Use of a
conventional filler metal (such as the Monel filler mentioned by one
of your sources) could lead to some unpredictable results because of
the interactions between all the alloying elements. As a guess, I
think you could probably use a copper braze material also.
For any of these cases, welding up a test sample would be highly
recommended.
Tom Doody
(remove NS from email address above for direct contact with me)
I have not had any direct experience with pure cobalt. I do have some
limited experience with cobalt alloys, such as Stellite (chrome and
carbon in cobalt). I would assume that the reactions you are getting
from others (too brittle, etc.) are based on their knowledge of cobalt
alloys rather than pure cobalt. Here are some facts about pure cobalt
(99.9%) [taken from ASM Metals Handbook, 9th ed., Vol. 2, p 725-726],
which are the basis of some of my tentative opinions on this matter:
Tensile strength in the as-cast condition: about 34 ksi (thousand
pounds per inch) [note that this is about 1/2 to 2/3 the value for
mild steel, which would be about 50-60 ksi, depending on the grade)
Tensile strength in the annealed condition: about 37 ksi (i.e. not
much change)
Tensile strength in the swaged condition: about 100 ksi.
Pure cobalt has an HCP crystal structure.
Melting temperature of 2723 deg F (1495 deg C).
Electrical conductivity is about 28% of pure copper
Thermal conductivity is 69 W/m2K, i.e. about 20% of pure copper.
Specific heat is 414 J/kgK, i.e. about the same as copper and steel.
From the above, I draw the following conclusions:
1) The material can be cold-worked to a high degree, based on the
information about tensile strength in the swaged condition.
2) The material is likely to be ductile, since it is an essential pure
HCP crystal structure plus the large amount of swaging that appears to
be possible. Brittle alloys would not show such increases in strength
upon swaging (you really cannot swage them at all...think cast iron as
an example).
3) The melting temperature, electrical conductivity, specific heat,
and thermal conductivity show similarities to steel alloys, i.e. there
is nothing highly unusual that would prevent using conventional
welding techniques.
Of course, the question is what would you weld it with? Could you do
this weld autogenously (i.e. without filler or using excess material
as the filler)? I do not know how the material would react but it
seems to be a reasonable possibility. Looking at a couple of phase
diagrams, it appears that either pure copper or pure nickel could be
used with a resulting weld metal that might be acceptable, but this is
just a best guess. Any way you do this, the weld is likely to be
somewhat harder and less ductile than the pure cobalt. Also note that
these two fillers are pure copper and pure nickel (an "unalloyed"
nickel filler metal is commercially available, see Inco's Nickel 200
filler metal, but it may be hard to get routinely). Use of a
conventional filler metal (such as the Monel filler mentioned by one
of your sources) could lead to some unpredictable results because of
the interactions between all the alloying elements. As a guess, I
think you could probably use a copper braze material also.
For any of these cases, welding up a test sample would be highly
recommended.
Tom Doody
(remove NS from email address above for direct contact with me)
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.