Did anyone beat Geoff? ....Ed
- posted
19 years ago
Did anyone beat Geoff? ....Ed
From ROL: Nope.
Close finish indeed. Geoff used a tube launcher and Doc went off a rail according to Doc. The tube seems to be the way to go. Kudos to the the winner and first loser. :-) A good effort by all involved.
Anthony J. Cesaroni President/CEO Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace
I have issues with some of the "induced paradigms" of the BB contest but I wouldn't want Geoff to think some of the vacuous ribbing I gave him in person would be mistaken for real issues.
I went into that noit liking a BB contest - blindly, I admit - but it was pretty cool.
IMHO, if Derek didn't drop his laundry on the way up, I'd guesstimate he woulda been right up there with Geoff and Doc.
If it wasn't for Geoff putting his money on the line, I never would entered the contest. Thanks for the motivation!!!
Congratulations to Geoff, Doc and all the other flyers.
Summary of my LDRS 23 experience:
1) 300+ hours design, construction and testing ......Tiresome2) $800+ for material, electronics, tools, motors etc. .......Poor return on investment
3) Recovering my primary Bowling ball rocket with a shovel ......PANIC!!!!4) Frantically completing my backup rocket and having a successful flight. ......Relief
5) All the stuff I learned along the way and the joy of friendly competition ..... PricelessGeoff, thanks again for the motivation and to all the people I met, and especially to BRS for the great job hosting the launch.
Wait until next year....
Rich Kroboth TRA#4148 L2 Webmaster Metropolitan Rocketry Association (METRA) Northern New Jersey Prefect #94
Just for the record, who used what motors? The AT I600R and CTI I540 sound like a couple of cool motors, was it one of these 'specials' that won it in the end?
-- Niall Oswald ========= UKRA 1345 L0 EARS 1151 MARS
"Gravity assisted pieces of the rocket raining from the sky should be avoided. It is also financially undesirable." Portland State Aerospace Society
There is no more $ for the competition next year. It'ds gonna be braggin' rights only...
Both Geoff and I used the CTI I540. I know I would have won if I could have used the tube. :-(
That's enough for me!
Thanks to YOU Anthony for making those motors.
I too would like to thank Geoff. (and have done so personally.) His cash prize really stirred up a crowd. There was some extremely inventive ideas and hopefully this part of the hobby will grow. I have been lofting bowling balls for a few years, but never worried about how high it would go. He has taken that part of my hobby to a new level.
There has been some things said, mostly at LDRS. Geoff beat me fair and square. Yes, he used a tube, harnessing a bunch of the initial thrust. I used a rail. At the 11th hour, he graciously offered the use of the tube, but it was taken down early so I couldn't use it. His flight was the higher ball and that is that. Contrary to "rumors" there is no animosity between us. Again, he beat me fair and square.
Watch for future updates. I WILL beat the record!
Doc
Doc / Geoff (et all)
As a "Bowling Ball Rocket" newbie I can appreciate the amount of work that went into your "most excellent" construction and design. Bluff body aerodynamics is a real challenge that I will continue to explore for next year. Bragging rights is enough for me also..........
I would like to gather some pictures of the other contestants and their rockets for our website. The altitude, weight and motor used would also be helpful. Contact me off list at snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net
Thanks, Rich < bowling ball rocket newbie > Kroboth TRA#4148 L2 Webmaster Metropolitan Rocketry Association (METRA) Northern New Jersey Prefect #94
Sounds like someone realized others could do it. Got by on an altimeter anomalie this time.
RDH8
Doc, Knowing you, thats what I would expect. The real question is, "What was your descent rate? And what was his?"
Too bad I had to drop out, it would have really mixed it up.
Mine was around 15fps. I don't know what anyone else did.
There would have been 3 of us scracthing at the finish line!
Doc
Point!
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.