Re: 20mm ammo can as a type IV magazine?

They also have cardboard shoe boxes that meet the requirements for APCP when intended to be used in PADs.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine
Loading thread data ...

My point entirely.

Is 6' underground secure? :O

Com'on they're just doing their job, for NATIONAL security,....

Joel. phx

Reply to
Joel Corwith

2 hooded locks will be a requirement if and when NPRM 968 is effective, My understanding is that BATFE is requiring all new applicants to have storage that meet these requirements in anticipation of NPRM 968 being effective.

reference:

formatting link
formatting link
]

Reply to
Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed

as previously posted,

from Blaster's Tool and Supply Company at

formatting link
formatting link
]

Reply to
Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed

Thank you. I couldn't find the reference. Joel.phx

formatting link
[
formatting link
]

Reply to
Joel Corwith

If those links didn't work for anybody else:

formatting link
Page 8 (4413) or search on "55.208, 55.210, and 55.211"

Joel. phx Thanks again for the cite.

formatting link
[
formatting link
]

Reply to
Joel Corwith

Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed wrote in news:mjGHb.59627$ snipped-for-privacy@twister.nyc.rr.com:

Interesting that they think it's ok to enforce rules that aren't even rules yet. I guess that's at least a little better than enforcing rules that are simply made up on the spot.

I wonder what this country would be like if police were allowed to make their own rules, then enforce them?

Reply to
David W.

Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed wrote in news:3mGHb.59656$ snipped-for-privacy@twister.nyc.rr.com:

Isn't it ironic that most rocketeer's magazines will cost significantly more than what's inside them?

Reply to
David W.

Isn't it moronic that the LOCK will cost more than a can of BP which wouldn't have to be stored if you bought a $100 pistol!!

Joel. phx

Reply to
Joel Corwith

Yes, especially when they're not delivered on time.

Oops, wrong magazine--sorry...

David Erbas-White

Reply to
David Erbas-White

It would be ironic if it were required by law. But it is not.

27 CFR 555.141-a-8
Reply to
Jerry Irvine

:)

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

You are presently enjoying the experience of observing it. So what do you think?

Jerry

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Yep. This is accurate, and NPRM 968 does not change this.

I agree it is absurd. Hey, the BATFE wants us to put Jerry's motors that have been classified as unregulated in a magazine! less hazardous than a flammable solid!!!

sans clue

- iz

Reply to
Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed

Instead of epoxy paint, consider using that spray coating made for the pick-up truck beds. A friend in Maryland used that after the BATFE guy wasn't happy with his storage box originally. -- Richard "hoping fot decent weather for a launch next weekend" Hickok

Reply to
Rhhickok

Matt, It's best to ask your agent what they will aprove before buying or making anything..keep the following quote in mind when dealing with the ATF..

"And of course always remember: What your ATF inspector says is true, nothing else matters. Not the Orange Book, not physics, not logic, and not the law."

Tony Alcocer

Reply to
Tony Alcocer

A deja search with 101.3 and an author = 'tony alcocer' uncovers an interesting odyssey!

Reply to
Joel Corwith

thanks, the links I provided earlier must be query results (temporary)

I uploaded the PDF file to ambr

- iz

Joel Corwith wrote:

Reply to
Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed

or enforce rules that ignore laws on the books, like APCP not meeting the definition of explosives set by congress

from 18USC40.841(d) at

formatting link
"Except for the purposes of subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j) of section 844 of this title, ''explosives'' means any chemical compound mixture, or device, the primary or common purpose of which is to function by explosion; the term includes, but is not limited to, dynamite and other high explosives, black powder, pellet powder, initiating explosives, detonators, safety fuses, squibs, detonating cord, igniter cord, and igniters."

(the excepted subsections relate to the commission of criminal acts)

- iz

Reply to
Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed

I give you something more moronic

if you possess an antique or replica of an antique firearm or cannon you can store 50 lbs of BP in your kitchen cabinet right above your microwave, toaster oven and coffee maker

but if you intend to use 1 gram of that BP for use in a ejection charge for rocket recovery you will need to have the LEUP, the qualifying storage meeting the distance requirements, and store that 1 gram of BP in your magazine after completing the required log entry and while completing required periodic inventories

the other 22,678+ grams can stay in your kitchen cabinet with no LEUP, storage, distance, logging or inventory requirements

"But wait! That's not all!"

the DoJ/BATFE will send their law enforcement agents around from time to time to make sure your 1 gram is being properly stored and logged. Oh, and BTW, violations of your 1 gram BP storage requirement is a felony.

completely insane!

- iz

Joel Corwith wrote:

Reply to
Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.