God bless AP.
- posted
20 years ago
God bless AP.
Agreed.
I'm a bit confused as to why our organizations aren't going directly to the press just as Schumer and Lautenberg have. It's blatently obvious that they're using direct "news conferences" and any press that will listen, to spin this situation in their favor.
Granted, a rebuttal directed to either one of them would be the "gentlemanly" thing to do, but I sincerely believe neither one of them would really care. With some of the tactics involved, this doesn't seem to be a "gentlemanly argument" anymore.
FWIW..
tah
They get their good info from ARSA and the media page linked to ARSA.
NAR and TRA are inept. Probably good they are NOT talking to the press. They would probably claim the current LAW requires LEUP for over 62.5g APCP which is NOT (*NOT*) the case per 55.141-a-8.
For that I do give him credit as well as the simple fact he posts here. Kudos indeed.
I disagree with many points of content.
Wickman does not at all. Let's be clear on that. He "delegates" to experts. Something 'Bunny" would do well to try more often.
Wicky?
NAR/TRA interfered with that. Other issues later piled on and here we are. It needed to be below the radar screen to succeed on that path.
He passed along "insider" rumours which of caourse were not true if for no other reason than lack of jurisdiction thanks to 27 CFR 55.141-a-8.
Agreed.
Jerry
At least he has a name, unlike the comparative deluge of anonymous posters trolling RMR lately.
No name = no credibility.
When dealing with the ATF and their scumbag tactics you have to out-scumbag them. Most aren't willing to do this, as the ATF has no morals-conscience-truth-credibility. The two poor, dumb senators were fed bad ATF info. If Lautenburg and Shumer had half a brain they would have researched everything before putting their foot in their mouths. But then again.....maybe they DO have HALF a brain. :-)
Chuck
>
Who are you talking about? I must have had him in the killfile already!! ;-)
Chuck
Poor, dumb senators fed bad data? Oh, puhleeze!
Schumer in particular has a history of this very tactic. He's been practicing it for years in his vendetta against gun owners, the firearms industry, the NRA, and the 2nd Amendment in general. Don't think for a minute that he's unaware of being fed bad data; exploiting bad data to further his own agenda is his stock in trade.
-Scott
(snippage)
Who would indeed be the question. How do I write a killfile filter for "those without names"? At least people could make up a semi realistic nom de plume, like "Chuck" or "Bill Schmitt", instead of silly stuff like "num knuts", "krAsH kersplat" or "John DeMar".
:-)
That would put them on the high end of the government intelligence spectrum.
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!
I am partial to "unbound quark" myself.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.