Well, as I read it, they WOULDN'T have expired if Jerry had completed the proper paperwork to instantiate a transfer. I also found it quite curious that Jerry was able to 'produce' several letters that he wrote that were not able to be 'found' in the other parties files. I wouldn't be as suspicious about this if Jerry had also produced letters from the other party, responding to his other letters, etc. I simply find it far too convenient that one party in the suit has 'copies' of the letters that were sent, but not proof (such as certified letter receipts, or the aforementioned responses, etc.) that they were TRULY sent to the other party. Again, I simply find it suspicious enough to raise a 'reasonable doubt' in my mind. I also find it interesting that up to this point Jerry has been stating that the 1986 letter 'proves' that he was right, and has restated that the document doesn't expire, while knowing full well that he had responded to the goverment points that it HAD, in fact, expired (because of lack of proper transference).
I also re-read the original 1986 letter, and have to agree with the interpretation that they don't say that slugs smaller than that specified are not explosive, they simply say that slugs larger than the specified size ARE. The only possible interpretation of that is that slugs smaller than the specified size MIGHT be explosive, and since the letter didn't say so, it is appropriate to infer that they could be, and treat them accordingly. In other words, since the material is nominally considered hazardous, then the responsibility would lie with the claimant to demonstrate that BELOW a certain size the material IS NOT explosive. That is NOT what the original letter states.
The only inference I can draw is that the testing lab did their tests on the chunk that they were provided, and weren't asked to try and determine a 'minimum acceptable' size that might be considered non-hazardous. If I were the cynical type, I would almost believe that the wording of the original document was intentionally vague, but who knows?
Hey slick, this is my email, wallacewe,@olg.com, or you can call me at 301.952.8525. BTW, I have no altopia account. Do you have the balls to contact me? BTW, I'll be at LDRS this year for sure and BALLS if I can get the time off from work. Who are you anyway; sounds like an alligator mouth and a canary a$$ hiding under the bed.
Hey, Fred - it looks like you've been talking so much of the same kind of trash as the Altopia troll[s] that folks are starting to find it hard to tell the difference...
Reminds me of the creep who sold our neighborhood out to the township. He's not long for this world and very lonely. We're not visiting. It's cruel. No one gives him a glance. If he had the strength he'd try to apoligize. But the damage was done and he has the title.
JI was just waiting to get caught.. Dave W.. Don't blame the messenger!
Seem the motors from "USR" (a nonexistent company by JI's own admission) were also shipped to TMT and S&T over the last few years. I'd bet using the same "legality" that he got busted for. Seems that neither S&T or TMT "turned him in"! (kind of indicates that all his rants about TRA and NAR are meaningless!)
While JI "claims" that TRA and NAR were "out to get him", seems he caught himself here! (to the tune of $40k).
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.