No problem. Let us know how your R/C effort turns out!
No problem. Let us know how your R/C effort turns out!
Neat idea - all the parts in one package.
What you are describing is a somewhat corse proportional R/C control. If I understand what I read on the SubCommittee FAQ, I would set your U-boat up as a dynamic diver.
If I understand things right, that should mean you only need two positions for the diving planes - one to dive, and one to trim for surface running - and a proportional speed control. This way, the faster you go, the deeper you dive, and vice versa.
The one thing I couldn't gather was were they say to trim the boat for neutral bouyancy as a dynamic diver...not sure just what that means in terms of waterline at dead stop.
There is no proportional control in the Radio Shack sub. Just ON/OFF Fwd/Rev.
The way that works is probably the motors, preset to push down, will drive the sub forward (reverse or stop one motor for turns) just below the surface until the antenna fades. The Revell UB size is not large enough for static diving hardware. In any case static bouyancy will be too ambitious for a first project.
The instruction booklet says go no deeper than 1 metre. The RC sub group says RC transmissions can be received underwater. So that 1 metre control may still be possible.
My proposal to add logic gate chips is to get that proportional control with latching (to eliminate jitters from unsteady finger pressure on the controls) and also to get more run time by separating the motor battery power from the battery for the Rx.
Neutral bouyancy I believe is to add flotation mass (styrofoam or wood) to get the sub to float with as little freeboard as practical. That way it wouldn't require so much power to dive using forward speed and preset hydroplanes. And it wouldn't pop up so fast once the control signals fade.
The RS sub's Tx has a flexible PVC molded antenna. I wonder if this is meant to be immersed to control the sub when it is submerged. The Tx itself can probably be sealed in a clear plastic bag, The Tx controls are membrane switches and will present no access problem when sealed inside the plastic bag.
Great! Now all I have to do is figure out how to add working depth charges to the Revell/Matchbox Corvette! I could base it on a "hammerhead" with some lead weight, but how would I light the fuse?? :-)
Bill Shuey
Don't laugh. Perhaps pack quicklime (CaO) in a "depth charge" canister. When dropped into water it reacts with water to produce calcium hydroxide and hydrogen gas. If your canister can contain the gas until bursting point you may have an underwater burst that spews out white powder and a lot of bubbles for effect. Won't sink anything though.
Great idea! This is the same as slaked lime right? Before electricity it was used in miners helmets and vaudeville halls. It gives off a eerie green glow; performers used to sit in a room with this light before going on so their eyes would adjust. Hence the term "green room."
Where would you suggest I go to buy some? tia,
The Keeper (of too much crap!)
Calcium hydroxide is the slaked lime. Slaked lime was used as whitewash on walls.
You can make your own quicklime (calcium oxide) by burning seashells or limestone (calcium carbonate.) The lab suppliers sell only analytical reagent grade CaO and that'll be too pricey.
I am not sure about the light being green. I believe what you are referring to is calcium carbide . See
Calcium carbide may be easier to buy than CaO.
also source of the term basking in the limelight.
Corrections:
Yup,my original purchase didn't work because of the most elementary of oversights. My AA cells were spent because I left them on in another RC toy.
Hookay. The Radio Shack "Mako" mini-sub has more built-in useful features than I had suspected.
The speed underway is barely walking pace but so long as it moves the Revell UB, can be steered somewhat, maybe able to dive, I will be satisfied. The slow speed and the wide turns of the Mako are perhaps more scale-like than the full dedicated RC hardware installations in model subs.
An idea for the rotatable rudders will be to link the pair with rearward tillers and add a pendulum. The pendulum will self center the rudders as well as tilt them in harmony with the direction of a banked turn.
The other idea is to point the R-UB hydroplanes slightly down so that the submarine remains submerged so long as there is forward movement. The Mako's motor pods are already preset slightly down for the same purpose I suppose.
I haven't opened up the Mako yet to see if the motor pod rotation can be adapted and linked for the R-UB's hydroplanes. But one necessity will be to make stronger hydroplane guards and attachment points in thr R-UB.
Large, empty gelcaps from your pharmicist - they disolve in water. Put a small lead weight in one end, fill with CaO, maybe a pinhole in the other end, seal with CA...POP!
Up to you to design the launcher...
Thanks for the clarification! I think I'll try the calcium carbide route. Had a friend who had a nasty experience filling ballons with acetylene. Cheers,
The Keeper (of too much crap!)
I forgot about seeing submarine conversions that needed oversized bow planes. Yep. The R Shack Mako minisub certainly won't go forward fast enough to dynamic dive, especially with the scale bow planes. But here's the latest.
I took apart the Mako mini sub to see its guts.
The sealed motor pod is 1 inch diameter and has a 1/2 inch post that allows it to be rotated on its axis. The R-UB's propeller shafts are
1 3/16 inches between centres. I can probably get a 1 3/16 in. thickness plexiglas sheet to use for the motor mounts. Staggering the motors will likely solve the problem of aligning the motors with the R UB's propeller shafts, a 1/16 in. difference.I'll have to find a 2 inch cap to seal both ends of the cylinder that houses the electronics, the servo and the battery pack. This module will be a cylinder 7 inches long and 2 inches diameter. There is sufficient room to fit this cylinder inside the R-UB.
The widest part of the R-UB deck is coincidently 2 inches. Dry fit tests. This will allow the cylinder module to be tilted up to remove the battery pack and also to drain any water leaked in. But once the cylinder module is installed in the R UB I won't be able to take it out unless I pull wider the hull plastic in the process.
The servo axle is transverse mounted to swivel the motor pods up or down. I was scratching my head as what to do with it as linking the servo to the dive planes would be too complex a job if at all possible. Then this idea came up. I would use it to move a paired float + weight parallelogram, something like a pantograph. The top of the pantograph will be floatation material and the bottom the ballast weights. To dive the bottom ballast is shifted forward and the top float backwards. The the trim of the sub will be shifted to the direction required while forces on the pantograph should balance out to give smooth operation. To raise the sub the pantograph geometry is reversed. If there is no Tx servo input it will return to its neutral position. Adjustable stops will be used to limit the throw of the pantograph and therefore the trim of the sub.
I have to position the cylinder module backwards to minimize the wire run to the motors. Coincidentally and happily the servo rotation to the pantograph will now correspond to the Tx commands.
The scale diving planes will be free to swivel, but will be held in alignment by a weak spring (from a floppy disk shutter spring.)
Everything might just work out. But as RC Boater says, seeing the R UB moving on the surface is probably fun enough.
Look up this webpage
In the box with a listing of "Components" go to "Submarines" and click on its highlighted "Homepage"
You will see a picture of a UB VIIC moving in the water. Click on the link there.
A German company already has a motorizing kit for the Revell U-Boat VIIC. Looks very good.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.