Gentlemen. With reference to Kim Siddorns article in the latest SE may I suggest that this newsgroup sets a similar standard as that suggested regarding rally field ?transgressors?. As this is an unmoderated (I believe that is the correct term) newsgroup it will rely on everyone to keep to the agreed standard. May I suggest that everyone simply ignore totally OT postings. Should these contributors of OT postings continue to post OT items, then give them the ?Black Spot? and ignore them (on group) even if they post something stationary engine related, for a certain period of time. This could also be applied to those who regularly seem to ?twist? a thread away from its original subject to their own (usually non stationary engine related) topic of interest. I will immediately put my hand up and admit to irrelevant postings regarding the end of Concorde?s service and several other OT threads, which won?t happen in future after threads regarding this posting (if any) come to an end. There must be others like myself who not being permanently online ends up downloading umpteen postings of which a fair proportion is becoming non stationary engine/associated equipment/rally related.
John Rogers