Does it relate to NTSC? We have PAL here in NZ as we started later
than everyone else (1961 I think) Programmes for the next twenty years at
least must have arrived here in photographic film format.
Greg.P.
although
If I remember from my Telecomm courses, when NTSC signal was weak, the
colour would change whilst for PAL in the same circumstance, only the
depth of the colour changes. Thus PAL copes with poor signals much
better than NTSC.
David
Complicated question, there are lots of flavours of NTSC and PAL, then there
is the French SECAM system and whatever the Chinese have developed. On the
ships we had multi-standard TVs with a bank of switches on the back and part
of my job was setting these up as we reached port. Kiwi and Aussie PAL is
slightly different from UK PAL but I cannot now remember what the difference
is (possibly the offset for the audio - too long ago to remember the
details). We used to get the Word Radio and TV Handbook which listed the
setting for each country, it's probably all available on line now but it's
late and I'm tired to too tired to run it through a search engine (Ask may
be better than Google as its a techie question).
Regards
Mike
My point was that TV programmes at the time I was commenting on came to NZ
as film stock, not in analogue or digital formats, so formats should have
made no difference.
Worked in TV export and repair in the early 1970s (managerial) and in
shipping 1970s-1980s.
Greg.P.
I have long wondered why the yanks insist on people being a universal
yellow/brown and everything else with a green halo. Goodness knows why
they stick to their rather inadequate colour system!
Peter
Probably because it would cost them too much to change.
Anyway, aren't we all supposed to be going to HD TV? There will probably
be several different systems for that, with the Yanks going to an
inadequate system they invented, the French going to another system just
to be French and different, whereas the rest of the world goes for the
best available at the time.
???? Not on my TV! Of course, I actually adjust the colours to suit me.=20
The source material (film, analog, digital) determines the colours, even =
with "colour correction" applied by the broadcaster (or whoever=20
transfers the material to disc.) Eg, BBC shows were invariably washed=20
out, looking a lot like old colour tinted b/w photos. Now that it's all=20
digitised, the colours are much more natural. The default colour palette =
is adjusted (if that's the word) to provide relatively inoffensive=20
colours from a wide variety of sources. Which means that none of it's=20
pleasing.
Google brought me this:
formatting link
Check out the links to Extreme High Definition and Super High Vision.
FWIW, I have 1680x1050 native resolution LCD monitor for this computer.=20
Very nice. Our TV is a Sony Bravia 42" 1080p. _Very_ nice! Lots of=20
adjustments for aspect ratio, sound, and colour. SD material (VHS tape,=20
DVDs) looks much clearer on it, too. Highly recommended, if you're=20
thinking of a new entertainment toy. ;-) Haven't sprung for a BluRay=20
player and probably won't. A couple of friends have told me you need at=20
least a 60" panel to see the difference between standard DVD and BluRay.
cheers,
wolf k.
"After over a half-century of use, the vast majority of over-the-air NTSC
transmissions in the United States were replaced with ATSC on June 12,
2009, and will be, by August 31, 2011, in Canada."
As I recall UK pal has the sound on the other sideband from the
antipodes chaps.
-----
Ah, just like the water goes down the plughole the other way down here.
[....]
Still too high. Once they get around $50, I'll think about BluRay again,
maybe.
Watched the new Star Trek movie last night (a gift from daughter and
son-in-law). Well done alternative time line. Looks like it could be a
good series, if they make the characters more complex.
No trains, though. ;-(
wolf k.
I remember my room mate buying a 13" b/w TV for $300 in 1956. $2,000 to
$3,000 in today's money (depending on how you calculate inflation.)
Which permits a segue into model railways:
Many people whinge about the high prices of model railways. They flinch
when they see an F7 diesel with DCC and sound offered at around $200.
But allowing for inflation, most models and kits are well within the
price range of the 1950s, and many are are cheaper. Besides, quality and
technology have improved, so that the price-quality ratio is much better
than way back when. Eg, that DCC sound equipped loco at $200 IMO
compares very favourably with a plain vanilla F7 loco _kit_ costing
about $20 in the mid-50s.
That improvement in price-quality ratio is one reason that kit and
scratchbuilding are now a niche market. Model builders are well served
these days, but most model railway enthusiasts are happy that so many
high quality ready to run models are available.
cheers,
wolf k.
SNIP...
FWIW, I have 1680x1050 native resolution LCD monitor for this computer.
Very nice. Our TV is a Sony Bravia 42" 1080p. _Very_ nice! Lots of
adjustments for aspect ratio, sound, and colour. SD material (VHS tape,
DVDs) looks much clearer on it, too. Highly recommended, if you're
thinking of a new entertainment toy. ;-) Haven't sprung for a BluRay
player and probably won't. A couple of friends have told me you need at
least a 60" panel to see the difference between standard DVD and BluRay.
cheers,
wolf k.
=======================================
Still got Sony TV bought over 14 years ago. Occasionally think about a new
one but find it difficult to justify it. Anyway as only watch childrens TV
and occasional re-run of the Sweeney doesnt seem worth it.
Cheers,
Simon
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.