Sound chips

I know I'm a bit of a cynic, but one explanation of Hornby's stance could be that they are aware of some future change, a new standard perhaps, that they are future proofing into. Just a thought.

Richard

Reply to
beamendsltd
Loading thread data ...

"beamendsltd" wrote

Gerrway - Hornby always follow and rarely if ever lead.

John.

Reply to
John Turner

Skaledale, live steam, zero one, LMS pacifics, super detail Royal Scot ....

Cheers, Simon

Reply to
simon

Cos every feature or unit of research costs, and all work should be prioritised. So "ease of use" and NMRA compliance will be competing for (finite resources) resources.

Cheers, Simon

Reply to
simon

Faller, Bing, ok, Trix Twin, Rivarossi... ;-)

Greg.P.

Reply to
Greg Procter

In 'OO' ?

Cheers, Simon

Reply to
simon

Err, Faller wasn't even HO for their first half century, Bing was any scale you wanted it to be, Trix Twin and Rivarossi were closer to OO than HO ... ;-)

Reply to
Greg Procter

therre we are then - they dont count !

Cheers, Simon

Reply to
simon

I don't think we're taking us seriously here!

Greg.P.

Reply to
Greg Procter

Thanks for the offer, there is a model shop near me that is good for that sort of thing, am a little worried that resetting CV8 will lose the "voice" of the engine or have I read somthing wrong??

Reply to
Phil

"simon" wrote

Skaledale copied Scenix

Hornby's Live steam was designed by a chap in Long Eaton

Trix Twin had OO-scale Princess and Princess Coronation classes pre-WW2

Both Mainline & Airfix had super-detailed (in comparison with other models of the day) in the 1980s.

John.

Reply to
John Turner

Hornby still predates Bachmann though whatever measure you use.

Kevin

Reply to
Kevin

Precisely. And what is wrong with copying other people anyway. The Japanese did very nicely out of it and Richard Branson has never innovated anything in his entire life and is doing very well indeed.

Kevin

Reply to
Kevin

More notable is that Hornby have stayed in business - no mean achievement. They must be doing something right, even if it doesn't match our personal preferences!

Richard

Reply to
beamendsltd

And he continues to spread the smokescreen about EMC compliance and NMRA compliance being mutually incompatible.

MBQ

Reply to
manatbandq

"beamendsltd" wrote

And when did Bachmann start trading? I've a sneaking feeling that it has roots in the 19th century.

The current Hornby company has little if anything to do with the original which I believe dates from the early 1920s and was an off-shoot of Mecanno.

The present name is only one of several reincarnations of the original Lines Bros company.

John.

Reply to
John Turner

Well, the Hornby name is still being used, although the company behind the name has undergone many radical changes.

And Trix Twin locos weren't accurate scale models by any stretch of the imagination.

Reply to
MartinS

Precisely. I couldn't have put it better myself. ;-)

Reply to
MartinS

"MartinS" wrote

Nor was much of Hornby's pre-war offerings, although the early Dublo products had a basis in scale. However, I never recall seeing a real Gresley N2 0-6-2T in GWR, LMS or Southern liveries.

I think you can say that the pre-war Trix models were on a par with some of the 'nearer scale' Hornby O-gauge toys.

John.

Reply to
John Turner

And they're still doing some of the Airfix and Mainline stuff I bought in the late 1970s - which got me back into the hobby. The 14xx and autocoach, he 61xx and B-Set, the Castle and Centenery stock.

When I was a kid I fell in love with a tinplate Trix SR Nelson EMU that was in a second-hand shop in Harrow.

Reply to
Christopher A.Lee

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.