Well after a lot of deliberation I've decided to build my layout in 00.
My years are '50 -'57 (roughly when I was actively train spotting) &
LNER (Darlington - Redcar). My questions are;
When did the BR emblems change from small to large?
When did the 'A's change from single to double chimney?
Anything else that is relevant?
Thanks
Norman
Surely someone knows when these changes were.
Please guys I've tried internet searches with no result & out here in
rural Alberta there's not a lot of people with LNER knowledger about.
Norman
Assuming you mean the change from old to new totems, late 1950s I
think.
Assuming you mean the A4s, 4 were built with double chimneys and the
rest got them between May 1957 and November 1958.
What you need is the LNER E-group on lner-list at yahoogroups.
I think the problem you have here Norman, is that your question is
vague and would require someone to write a book to give any sort of
meaningful answer.
First you ask when did BR emblems change from small to large, so what
emblem are you asking about? If you mean the emblems carried on locos
the early ones came in two sizes intended for locos with different
sized spaces to put them in. However different workshops had different
ideas on which size to put where. You have to find photos of the
specific loco you are interested in if you want to be accurate. Both
sizes were used in parallel. The later emblem was introduced in 1956
so would only appear on a newly shopped loco in your time frame but
similarly had two sizes. For a general view of the changes try and
find Railway Liveries, BR Steam 1948-68 by Brian Haresnape ISBN
0-7110-1856-1, you never know what Amazon can find.
As for when the 'A's got double chimneys, how long is a piece of
string? The Eastern Region in your time frame had several hundred
locos in classes from A1 to A10 and was still building them. Some had
double chimneys some didn't. The date when they were changed, if they
were changed is different for every individual loco. You have to chose
your loco and then find out.
There are books a plenty and lots of websites, pick your class or even
specific loco number and get busy with Google and google-images, also
search on LNER etc. Also you can find the HMRS and most line societies
via
Keith
railway
It's nothing like that, the problem was that the OP's question were
just far to wide, his chosen time period he would have seen both BR
'coats of arms' [1] although he would be safer running only the early
version. As for "When did the 'A's change from single to double
chimney?" - which 'A' class, 1,2, 3 or 4....
You see, it's not a willingness to help, but a willingness for some
to ask coherent question, after using Google searches (for both
Internet and Usenet) - for example this site was mentioned regarding
LNER loco's etc only a week or two back,
formatting link
Anyway, out of arguments comes facts, it's called debating the
issue....
[1] yes I know that they are not really Coats of Arms.
Norman,
To add to what others have said, on the matter of ex LNER locomotives,
your best bet would be to get a copy, or copies, of the appropriate
Yeadons books to get all the nit picking detail about an LNER loco
class. I think the complete list of the books is on this site.
formatting link
I've got Volume 16 which covers the V1/V3 and L1 tanks and it is full
of information about each individual locomotive - like where they were
shedded and dates and details of repairs, overhauls, etc. There's
a good potted history of the classes and a load of very good
photographs, covering LNER and BR days, so plenty of examples of
liveries in BR days.
Jim.
Nother good series of books comes form these people:
formatting link
They do a series of photo albums called British Railways, then and now, with
a then picture and a now picture, captioned. Have a look, they certainly do
more than one volume covering yorkshire and prototype pictures like this
will tell you more than anything what you want to know.
No! No! No! We never argue on this newsgroup! We were discussing, and what
we were discussing was the legitimacy of discussing empty boxes. This is an
important distinction, you know. Historians of the future will be carefully
analysing the archives of this newsgroup for the undisputed facts about
railway modelling, and we do not want to mislead them, do we?
Cheers,
Steve
My apologies Steve
You are absolutely correct, as a Monty Python fan I ought to know
better. This quote is what discussion ought to be all about.
I'm sure that you expect the right to have babies?
Kevin Martin
My apologies Steve
You are absolutely correct, as a Monty Python fan I ought to know
better. This quote is what discussion ought to be all about.
I'm sure that you expect the right to have babies?
Kevin Martin
Thank you very much Tim. You have given me the exact information I was
seeking.
It does raise one immediate question for me though if you are correct
about the A4s. TMC have 60032 Gannet listed as; A4, early crest, SINGLE
CHIMNEY, non corridor.
Thanks too to Kevin Martin for expressing my thoughts so well & taking
the flak. I have come to the conclusion after a couple of years of
lurking here is that the ng has become an 'old boys club' not very
tolerant of newcomers & definitely more interested in debating possible
announcements from manufacturers than helping newbies.
As I travelled on a regular basis from Tees-side to South Hampshire
from 1943 - 1958 & from Tees-side to Weston-s-Mare from 1958 - 1966
I've decided that imagination rules not prototype.
Thanks to all who helped
Norman
Back on the empty box topic, there was a record collector on the US
Antiques Road Show with a large collection of Beatle-related 45s, complete
with sleeves. He said he had picked up some of the records for $1, but
paid up to $150 for an empty sleeve!
Jerry I'm actually a very friendly guy. I asked a very friendly
question which initially drew no response at all friendly or otherwise.
I asked again & apart from Tim & Kevin who gave me the information I
was seeking the rest of the replies seemed to be of the go away & read
books (books I have to say I can't afford on a limited budget).
I think the real answer to your statement is, friendly is as friendly
does.
I would really would have liked to ask a coherent question & thought I
had. Couldn't you, instead of being pedantic about 'coats of arms',
have given rough dates for the change from British rail on tenders to
the early crest to the late crest & for chimney changes to ALL As. Now
that in my book would have been FRIENDLY, But what the heck I didn't
come here for an argument I came seeking enlightenmen so I'll go back
to lurking in the hope of catching some crumbs from the old boys table.
Once again thanks to all those who helped
Norman in Alberta
Dont do it Norman we lesser time expired (newbies after the few seconds of 5
years in the hobby !) are needed in the group. As another long term lurker
that has decided to jump in I recon there are some very helpful and
knowledgable people here but without new blood occasionally it will become
the old boys table you describe. Topics will become stale and jokes doing
the rounds yet again.
There does seem to be a bit of a score points culture but when its tempered
with humour - as some do - then who cares.
As an extra to the info you were given someone may say that some workshops
were slower at implementing livery changes than others. Plus in most cases
locos wouldnt get the new livery untill due for major overhaul. In the
unlikely event I remember correctly, late BR crest came in 1957 but there
would still be many engines with early emblem in the early 60's.
If any errors there then someone please correct ....
I'll say again Normon - keep posting - I might.
Cheers,
Simon
otherwise.
Guessed correctly would be a better way of putting it, I had a 1 in 4
chance of answering your question correctly but chose not to guess
but ask what 'A' class you meant - how is that wrong?
of the replies seemed to be of the go away & read
friendly
I suggested you Googled, not buy books, I even gave you a URL that
might have shed some light on one of your questions.
thought I
No, that is the point, they didn't change all the BR 'insignia' over
night, some loco's still had 'BRITISH RAILWAYS' on tender or tank
sides as late as 1950, or still had the early 'coat of arms' in the
early 1960's, I did say that you could use the later example but
would be safer to only use the early example, as for the chimney
changes - again on which class of 'A' and then what do you want if
you had told us the actual class (rather than the wheel
arrangement!), some one to write a dissertation on the modifications
to a whole class, the advise you were given was to find a photo of a
loco in the given year that you want to model which is the best
advise you or anyone can be given.
Now
didn't
Friendly people accept what they get, arsewipes expect...
"Norman" wrote
It didn't - it was dependent upon the size of the loco. Or do you mean when
did it change from early to late emblem? If so the answer was 1957.
Some A4s were built with double chimneys as were some A1s and some A2s.
Relevent to what?
John.
Well we know which class you put yourself in as you "expected" my to
ask a coherent question/
Thanks Jerry you have once again re-enforced the fact that newcomers
are not welcome in this newsgroup. I have the emails off group & your
attitude to back that statement up.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.