- posted 18 years ago
Umm no. Still have trouble following along I see.
lock picking the club
Loading thread data ...
- posted 18 years ago
Two indentical vehicles parked next to each other I think it is quite safe to
say that any thief with at least half a brain will attempt to steal the one
without the rope tangled about the steering wheel. However if you can't figure
out the difference between the rope and the "club" there is no reason for me to
waste time explaining it to you.
- posted 18 years ago
Well you responded to my message, not directly to his, so I figured you did
that on purpose.
- posted 18 years ago
Then what you are saying is that my analogy wasn't so lame... And this
thread never indicated that the club and a rope were identical in any way
except that they would both provide an annoyance to a thief (albeit, one
more than the other).
- posted 18 years ago
Yes, I think you are... Either the rope trick will or will not cause an
annoyance and posibly deter said thief... Your "too lame to be worthy"
comment lends to a retraction.
- posted 18 years ago
No. My too lame to be worthy comment is a simple and obvious statement of fact.
The fact that you fail to recognize it as such is of little surprise.
- posted 18 years ago
There is only the slightest similarity between the two. Consequently your
analogy is lame. Hopefully you comprehend (Although I doubt it) now that it has
been spelled out for you in exhausting detail.
- posted 18 years ago
reduces
I figured you did
yea, I responded to your remark about his response.
understand now ?
- posted 18 years ago
message
<hSmPb.10185$ snipped-for-privacy@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com>
work
that said thief
annoyance.
think it is quite safe
attempt to steal the
However if you can't
is no reason for
lame... And this
identical in any way
thief (albeit, one
you should try and understand what is being posted instead
of trying to "guess"
what is being said.
my2¢
my2¢
- posted 18 years ago
not cause an
to be worthy"
its you thats having trouble understanding.
not PYSH.
just because you misunderstand is no call to try and blame
PYSH.
lets just snip the subject and move on to another.
my2¢
lets just snip the subject and move on to another.
my2¢
- posted 18 years ago
Sure... don't understand why, but I understand that's what happened.
- posted 18 years ago
You are just confirming I was right... You just don't want to spell "that"
part out... Didn't have to waste time "spelling out" the other fluff.
- posted 18 years ago
I understood all along... Just wanted him to take a stance...
- posted 18 years ago
will
lame
blame
stance...
PYSH is a very bright person.
he was probably just jerking your chain a little.
lets all move on now, ok
g'day
g'day
- posted 18 years ago
LOL I'm not surprised at all that you managed to totally misunderstand
everything said and arrive at the wrong conclusion once again. I've come to
expect it of you. You do realize that for your original argument to be logical
thieves in general would have to ignore the path of least resistance and all
things being equal attack the hardest target available. That is of course a
rehtorical question since in order to arrive at that conclusion you would have
to be capable of logical thought. :).
- posted 18 years ago
The Club is a waste of money.
- posted 18 years ago
That is your opinion which you can't seem to support in any way. That and fifty
cents might still get you a cup of coffee some places.
- posted 18 years ago
To a real thief, it's a 10 second (if that) delay... Waste of money... By
the way, I'm also of the opinion that you are an asshole... Do I have to
support that? Didn't think so... It's my opinion.
- posted 18 years ago
This argument plays over and over:
What percentage of thieves are "real"? I.e., skilled technically. If
it is really high, then it is pretty clear that only really good
security methods can possibly deter the theft.
If it is low - then not-too-good security methods will deter a high percentage of thieves, and so provide some degree of additional security.
If it is very low - then these same methods provide a fairly good degree of additional security.
This additional security is only provided as long as nothing particularly attracts "real thieves". So I wouldn't recommend a Club for, e.g., a Brinks money delivery armored van.
Is this concept so hard to understand?
If it is low - then not-too-good security methods will deter a high percentage of thieves, and so provide some degree of additional security.
If it is very low - then these same methods provide a fairly good degree of additional security.
This additional security is only provided as long as nothing particularly attracts "real thieves". So I wouldn't recommend a Club for, e.g., a Brinks money delivery armored van.
Is this concept so hard to understand?
- posted 18 years ago
60 Minutes or some similar new thing did a show on the club...
they TIMED the guy, getting it off the steering wheel... 45 SECONDS... sure slows them down...
--Shiva--
they TIMED the guy, getting it off the steering wheel... 45 SECONDS... sure slows them down...
--Shiva--
Site Timeline
-
Tool kit idea
- I am in the process of confining my tools into kits for common tasks. So far I...
- next in
🔒 Lockmithing and Lockpicking Discussions
-
Slaymaker combination lock
- I have very old slaymaker combination lock was bought 1977 , still is in good...
- last updated in
🔒 Lockmithing and Lockpicking Discussions
-
What type of lock would use this key?
- Hi, At the link below is a pic of a key that belonged to my late father. I'm...
- last posted in
🔒 Lockmithing and Lockpicking Discussions
-
laser do betonu
- Po weekendzie z wiertarkÄ… ... nie ma jakiegos laserowego dziurkacza do betonu?...
- site's last updated in
Engineering Science (Polish)
-
laser do betonu
- Po weekendzie z wiertarkÄ… ... nie ma jakiegos laserowego dziurkacza do betonu?...
- site's newest in
Engineering Science (Polish)