Buoyancy gedanken

"Don Foreman" wrote: Two experiments have shown cases where this is not true, and the results are consistent with theory -- though perhaps not with your theory. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Your experiments were neatly designed. My compliments. I think the distance between us is in the definition of "displaced liquid." I define the displaced liquid as the volume of the floating object that is beneath the surface. With that definition, I believe your experiments are in agreement with my theory.

Reply to
Leo Lichtman
Loading thread data ...

I wonder if this could be considered as a variation of the "hydrostatic paradox" problem? If you have a 1' diameter pipe and a 1" dia. pipe and they are both vertical and 10' long full of water, a pressure gauge placed at the bottom of either will read the same. In the floating object experiment the pressure on the bottom of the object in PSI is a function of the height of the water from the surface to the bottom of the object rather than the quantity of water. That's how I analyzed the problem anyway. Engineman

Reply to
engineman1

Define the system from the reference frame of the floating object.

"Fluid will rise around the object until the pressure due to the column of fluid (column as measured from the bottom of the object to the top of the fluid), times the area of the bottom of the object, equals the weight of the object", assuming the object will float.

Very clean conceptually for flat-bottomed objects, just a little calculus for irregular objects.

Dave

Reply to
spamTHISbrp

With that definition, yes. I'll defer to you to explain how an object displaced 150 grams of liquid when there were less than 20 grams of liquid to begin with ...

Reply to
Don Foreman

Exactly. That's true both in the constrained case and in a lake or pool.

Reply to
Don Foreman

Well, this has been an interesting thread, I learned a few things about buoyancy and saw an example of military intelligence.

Engineman

On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:30:49 -0700, " snipped-for-privacy@aol.com"

Reply to
engineman1

Military intel in this thread?

Reply to
Don Foreman

I think that was a poke at me Don...;-)

Pete

Reply to
Pete Snell

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.