Freelancer Payment Protection Act

May 31, 2012 48 Replies

No, that's historically incorrect. The historical fact is that doctors treated indigent patients whether they could pay or not. Ron Paul described this in one of the recent debates. He was practicing back at a time when medical costs were much lower, and doctors and hospitals almost always found a way to treat patients who couldn't afford it.

EMTALA became necessary when medical costs rose so high that following the Hippocratic Oath put a large, and potentially bankrupting, burden on medical practitioners.

Does the state assembly where it has been proposed qualify as decent?

formatting link
After a quick reading it does seem reasonably limited see lines 7-10: 7 2. "INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR" MEANS A SOLE PROPRIETOR WHO IS NOT AN 8 EMPLOYEE AND WHO IS HIRED OR RETAINED BY A CLIENT FOR AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 9 OR GREATER THAN SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS; BUT SHALL NOT INCLUDE A 10 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR. so not for people that have a CFO to camp out in the lobby demanding pay...and government involvement is the use of the labor department to recuperate payment, instead of heading out to court. 26 2. THE COMMISSIONER SHALL INVESTIGATE AND ATTEMPT TO ADJUST EQUITABLY 27 CONTROVERSIES BETWEEN CLIENTS AND INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS RELATING TO 28 THIS SECTION.I see no requirements for more documentation than a simple contract, so freelancers are still easier for the company. and easier remedies are made available for the freelancer starting out until they get to the point they will be hiring others to assist and become a small business themselves.-- Stephen B.

Thanks for the link. It is not obviously poisonous nor does it seem to = be much help, just more govmonk interference.

?-/

As usual, government exempts itself:-

THE TERM "CLIENT" SHALL NOT INCLUDE A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY AGENCY, BOARD, DEPARTMENT, COMMISSION OF THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF.

and, interestingly, real estate people.

I wonder what kind of abuses led to this intrusive legislation..

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

you don't need data for legislation - just a story.

-- Les Cargill

The law (EMTALA) is not derived from communist economic theories. It's derived from codified Christian moral values.

and it is those "codified moral values" that are driving our health care costs through the roof. We have to abandon christian morality and adopt selfishness to make the republican plan of not paying for anything with public money work out. We have to allow epidemics to wipe out 85% of our population when they get going because preventive care is too expensive. We have to eliminate emergency room rights for the indigent

- after all, if god wanted them to live, they wouldn't get sick - medical care is only for the rich, not for the poor. And we don't need any pollution controls because after all the rich can afford advanced air filters, and killing off those with less money would be good for the economy - less mouths to feed, less homeless to trip over walking from the air conditioned Mercedes to the air conditioned office. And of course there is no need for public education, after all, an educated public could figure out what is going on, but an illiterate and uneducated public can only go along with the flow. And of course some cooperation with the drug cartels can keep that uneducated public submissive.

Isn't the republican way wonderful? isn't this a great vision for the glorious America? From sea to shining sea, poor workers and comfortable rich owners. Just what any ruling class would want.

Jonn Hancock would be aghast.

Quite unfortunately all too true. And the legislation does not have to have anything to do with the story.

?-)

Probably not. You are describing conditions similar to those that existed during his lifetime.

-- Cheers,

John B.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required