Holders DOJ denies voter fraud

formatting link

The Department of Justice is in full-on spin mode over the James O?Keefe Project Veritas tape in which a young white man is offered Attorney General Eric Holder?s ballot. Desperate to prove that voter ID should not be presented in order to obtain a ballot, the DOJ fired back at O?Keefe and Project Veritas today, with a DOJ official telling tried-and-true media ally Talking Points Memo, ?It?s no coincidence that these so-called examples of rampant voter fraud consistently turn out to be manufactured ones.?

This is nonsensical. Obviously this wasn?t an actual case of voter fraud?O?Keefe and Project Veritas didn?t want to break the law. And obviously the situation is manufactured?it?s the only way to show that voter fraud is easy and plausible, since we presumably don?t know when voter fraud takes place. That, in fact, is the point of the video: that voter fraud in this way is virtually undetectable and bears almost zero risk.

But the DOJ isn?t interested in the real point of the video. They know full well that voter fraud is simple when nobody has to show identification. They just don?t care, since they?re happy to watch political allies take advantage of the loopholes. Instead of targeting O?Keefe and Project Veritas for showing the American public the dangers of the current voter identification system, the Department of Justice and Holder are apparently interested only in preserving the absence of voter ID, no matter how many fraudulent ballots are actually cast.

formatting link

-- "The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their? president.. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince".

Reply to
Gunner Asch
Loading thread data ...

Gunner Asch on Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:56:40 -0700 typed in misc.survivalism the following:

The only thing to make it better, would be if it had been a young white _female_, but ...

MinTruth bleats: "Quack-quack. Vote fraud doesn't happen except when They manufacture it. Pay not attention to how easy it was done, it was a manufactured stunt. Quack, quack" And all the Democrat true believers duckspeak right along "No Voter Fraud is proven, no voter fraud is proven. Quack!"

tschus pyotr

Reply to
pyotr filipivich

Sorry stupid people, there is no "voter fraud". But what we do have is a concerted effort by the right wing to eliminate as many people from the voting rolls as it can. New laws eliminating weekend voting, ending the ability to register and vote immediately, and demanding picture IDs to vote, all have the same intent. That is to keep people from voting and this is mainly aimed at the poor and minorities. So don't buy the voter fraud lies, it's really about keeping people from the polls who tend to vote for Democrats. In other words it's just another right wing dirty trick.

Hawke

Reply to
Hawke

I have no problem with laws that insure the person getting the ballot is indeed entitled to vote . Helps keep dead people and Mrs. Smith's Schnauzer from casting ballots for a Democrat .

Reply to
Snag

Hawke on Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:40:54

-0700 typed >> Gunner Asch on Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:56:40 -0700

Hawke old quack, you and Holder would not recognize vote fraud if you were shown your names on the municipal registry for Tijuana. And you have no problem with vote fraud in the name of The Party. So go back to buying votes with cigarettes and other drugs.

Reply to
pyotr filipivich

Hawke's a true believer - and if Eric Holder says there is no vote fraud, then there is no vote fraud. Ignore that man getting Eric Holder's ballot - he'snot a Democrat, so it doesn't count.

I swear, you could sell these guys a box of rocks if you told them it was proved by the Democrats to prevent vote fraud.

Reply to
pyotr filipivich

Saw Delaware vanity tag "GUNNR" this am. I assume the state would not allow "GUNNER".

Thought you'd like to know.

Reply to
Frank

More likely somebody else already had GUNNER...

Reply to
Richard

Most likely although they won't allow some potentially provocative things.

Reply to
Frank

"Not available." But if you try "FUCKR," they say they don't accept offensive plates.

formatting link
You can reserve "CUNNER," (a small saltwater fish) for 60 days...

Reply to
Ed Huntress

I wonder if the guy in the white Corvette that I saw several years back still has his plate "IGO-469"

Reply to
grmiller

I HAVE Schnauzers and they are much more intelligent than to vote for Leftists, don't insult them! Now, Bijon Freises on the other hand...

Besides, watching leftists trying to promote voter fraud is rather entertaining.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

French poodles are all leftists! You can see it in their beady little eyes. ;-)

Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

Had not seen that. Good site. I could get my last name but extra $40/year is not worth it. That doubles the annual registration cost of $40.

Reply to
Frank

I'd find it ammusing, if I were not so horrified at the direction the USA is going. We used to be a nation of laws, and of working people who were for the most part honest and decent. Now, we're a power grab, unemployed, and the worst of the worst, in so many regards. Let me make myself perfectly clear.

Christopher A. Young Learn more about Jesus

formatting link
.

I HAVE Schnauzers and they are much more intelligent than to vote for Leftists, don't insult them! Now, Bijon Freises on the other hand...

Besides, watching leftists trying to promote voter fraud is rather entertaining.

Reply to
Stormin Mormon

I think that most states have them. They're fun for playing around and imagining how much trouble you can cause. d8-)

Reply to
Ed Huntress

We used to be a nation of laws, now we're a nation of self proclaimed lawyers.

Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

I just can't see how the hell that Liberals can defend Holder! He is such a blatant racist, liar and immoral asshole. Oh, that was a stupid statement, of course I see how they defend him...it's a birds of a feather thing.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

Rampant mental illness is a terrible thing. :(

Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.