alternative to Hatch/Kohl 724 in the works

izzy · 2003-07-23T15:59:37+00:00

[ from ROL Re: Mark Bundick 'call to action' issue at 7/23/2003 12:51AM ]TRA and NAR endorse the Hatch-Kohl amendment and that is what they aretrying to push through the Senate. NAR and TRA are not trying to getEnzi's S724 passed by the Senate. If you do not support the Hatch-Kohlversion of S724, do not write or fax letters to Senators to get holdremoved.I have been working on a compromise verison of S724 based on an ideafrom Senator Enzi that will not require rocketeers to have ATFEpermits no matter what size motor, yet satisfy the concerns ofSenators and Representatives. It more than goes halfway to meet anylegitimate concerns.I have been working with a group of individuals that represent a goodcross-section of amateur, HPR and hobby shop owners. We think we havesomething that will be acceptable to most everyone. I plan to postthis compromise version in a few days.This compromise S724 based on Senator Enzi's idea is what the Senateshould pass and what many of us will be pushing for. We do not endorsethe Hatch-Kohl version of S724 and do not want to see that passed bythe Senate. Consequently, we do not support the NAR-TRA "call toarms".John Wickman [ posted here by iz ]

Jul 23, 2003 123 Replies

Rate this thread:

David W. 22 years ago

kaplow snipped-for-privacy@encompasserve.org.TRABoD (Bob Kaplow) wrote in news:hMgXEpQP9$ snipped-for-privacy@eisner.encompasserve.org:

Don't forget vests, tennis shoes, plastic and metal pipe, envelopes and boxes.

Vote

Bob Kaplow 22 years ago

Either way. And matching AM numbers (those who only did it once)

Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!

Vote

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required