I think one of the guys I wrote a letter for tried this & they wouldn't go for it. That is what I initially tried before I got my LEUP & they didn't go for it.
Phil Ste>"David W." wrote:
Phil Stein
David W. wrote:
Our local vendor will not _store_ motors for other people because he doesn't have the room to spare. But we can still buy and fly at the site.
After. I love surprises. Especially promised 12 and delivered 6 or less surprise.
It wasn't under attack then.
It wasn't under attack then.
Well except from within TRA itself.
Well except from within AT itself.
Zero?
Huh? At what point do you non-pay for a non-product published by a non-intellect?
That is definitely the good news on this post but it does NOT rationalize the mismanagement of HPR magazine in the very least.
It's not worth reading. It has no HPR content and painfully few ads.
Thank god you are worried about your job!
Yes I agree.
Jerry
You are the sole and only help!!
Gee I wonder why?
TRA invited BATFE to the party.
ATinvited BATFE totheparty
NARinvited BATFEtotheparty.
The politicians can ignore us, and if we merely are allowed to follow the law contrary to NAR/TRA/AT policy we would be in double digit growth.
By NAR/TRA/AT policy.
NAR/TRA/AT
snip
Agreed.
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
Exactly.
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
Because they are certified morons. At least they are certified!
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
No enforcement at all.
Yet it is there, but as I claim and as omitted in the NAR/ATF lawsuit, ONLY when containing 1.1D AP which is 45 microns or smaller which IS on the explosives list.
Unless NAR and TRA fail or refuse to claim the above defined position.
UNLESS having a burning rate uinder 2.2mm/s. ELSE 4.1 Flammable Solid.
You can store flammable solids, oxidizers, flammable liquids, corrosives in residential areas up toa certain weight limit, typically 500 pounds or so (one drum) (each).
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
You have no LEGAL choice.
Motors are EXEMPT explosives per 27 CFR 555.141-a-8
Natch.
Yes not guilty,the law itself is the precident. It would not have survived the preliminary hearing.
Unless NAR or TRA or an interested third party file a motion to compel a hearing on summary judgement.
They refuse because NAR and TRA love the abuse to vendors. They started it with the whole voluntary LEUP thing, why in hell would they want to actually stop it? The only reason the pleadings are so convincing toward my position is the attorneys for NAR and TRA would have been derelict of duty if they did not advocate the very laws NAR and TRA have been breaking for almost 10 years.
Just Jerry
Sometimes attorneys ARE your freinds, and your friends are your worst enemies. This is precisely one of those cases.
Donate to the lawsuit!!! Heck, pay the attorneys directly to prevent the typical skim to the Kelly needs a truck fund.
I already got volunteered. I won.
Jerry
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.