SRN Prize Distribution Poll Results

Is this the same McLaughlin? This guy was disbarred? Boy that sure puts 2 and 2 together... thanks!

Hmmm... the following footnote appears: "An exhaustive discussion of the accused's multiple acts of misconduct would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public."

And this is after a list of 11 specific "professional conduct" regulations and laws violated - what are they saying, then:

That says a lot right there, doesn't it... "That's just the _short_ list... the gory details would be _so_ not fit to print!"

Was this guy a walking example of where lawyer jokes came from, or something? (If that were the case, it might somewhat account for why he was so touchy about them...)

-dave w

If this is the same Jim McLaughlin that is on RMR then that explains the whacked view Jim takes on a consistent basis.

To be disbarred... especially from the Oregon bar... is a feat in and of itself. Talk about being voted off the island. This guy is circling the drain.

I'm glad that one leaked through my JMcL message filter. Nice hunting! There should be an rmr community award for this. ;)

-John

It does not change the value of his statement. While he IS 100% right, there is also no enforcement on the point.

No he just became senile and this is how they ended the madness.

Just because Jim WAS disbarred and (basicly for senility) he IS a "turd" does not change that what he is saying in this particularinstrance is correct.

Yes they do and they are distancing themselves and pissed :)

Very enlightening!

Anybody know who won?

-- Drake "Doc" Damerau

Not just Oregon; Massachusetts also disbarred him:

That still does not discredit automatically everything he says. It just means he is having personal problems or did and they are over now.

I think Mark Bundick is a moron who should be removed from office for cause, but when he occasionally does something good I praise it.

Jerry