Poll Results, nar or TRA

Heh make that almost 6:1 Wow WOW! I guess TRA is giving the hobbyist what THEY want :)

snipped-for-privacy@juno.com wrote:

You missed the one SIAR vote.

And 1834 people emailed me to say your a twit.

See, I can pull numbers out of my ass too!

Interesting that the poll thread, according to google groups (which, apparently, is what you use), doesn't even have enough posts in it to account for all the NAR votes, much less the TRA ones.

ok- thanks for the poll , now crawl back into the hole

A simple statistical analysis of these numbers is enough to prove beyond any resonable degree of doubt, that they're fraudulent.

Nice try, though.

Probably more like...a meth lab.

You need to post the newserver which has 102 voting replies to your poll(s); none of the servers or archives I can find has anything close to those numbers. Not even Google Groups, from which my server receives the news feed with your posts.

In actuality, its about 3 to 1 for the NAR on USENET r.m.r., with about a tenth of your numbers of voting replies.

BTW, you cannot post (fabricated) e-mail numbers to a USENET poll result. The very purpose of a USENET poll is to present public results which can be seen and verified by all.

This guy is one of those people to which I was referring in previous posts. I've been reading several of his posts lately. He is part of the problem that I have with TRA and I'm sure calls any NAR member a "NAR Weenie" while hiding behind a fake Usenet name.

I know many good people that only belong to TRA, but it's attitudes like the one this moron has that has soured my support for TRA. I see TRA people belittle NAR people, but I've never seen NAR people "bash" TRA people. NAR people are an overall better class of people.

I think I'm going to let my TRA membership lapse next year.

Doc

TO be fair, I don't think one anonomous jerk is representitive of TRA any more than one weenie (Shockie) is representitive of NAR.

It does happen. I have seen it, not that empirical evidence is of any value.

That is just as divisive...can't we all just get along? Don't let this one individual drag you down to their level.

lunarlos = "liar liar pants on fire"

another troll response brought to you courtesy of none other than Phil "cyberstalker" Stein....

shockie B)

Don't get excited. I'm just recognising you as a high quality weenie. You are the king. Not that that's a bad thing. 8-)

How many voted for neither?

Wow! Those must be the same people who are purported to privately send supportive emails to another RMR garbage-spewer.

The only difference being that the other once, about 1 in 1000 messages, actually posts something USEFUL.

-Kevin

The Lurkers support me in e-mail They all think I'm great don't you know. You posters just don't understand me But soon you will reap what you sow.

I feel your numbers mean nothing. A more precise count would be to simply show actual membership enrollment numbers... those who have put their money where their mouth is. There really is no other valid standard.

No matter how you rate it, "if you can only choose one" would still be settled by the organization with the greater number, as obviously that organization would have had more choosers choosing only one organization... double joiners inflate both organizations equally.

Are you still so sure...?

~ Duane Phillips.

That's not fair. An anecdotal poll is meaningful.

What I find interesting is the high level of TRA participation in the poll but not on rmr where the poll eminated from.

The TRA BOD information control procedures are clearly working.

Consider yourself effectively muffled.

Jerry

Ironic, isn't it?