Poll Results, nar or TRA

Hey hey,
well I have tallied the totals from posts and emails. I asked the question as to which organization you would belong to if you had to make a single permanent choice. Well I am not surprised by the responce, but I am surprised about the sheer NUMBERS!
I think that if you are a nar director or prefect, you may want to take serious notice of these numbers ... ok here goes ...
35 postings chose NAR 7 emails chose NAR
67 Postings chose TRA 178 emails chose TRA
====================42 People total supported NAR 245 People total supported TRA
=> TRA support is almost 5:1 to nar support. WOW! With Nar losing 12% of its senior members alone this year, and its alot, I didn't expect the poll numbers to be as high as they turned out to be ... WOW!
Well its nice to know that I am supporting the more popular organization :)

Heh make that almost 6:1 Wow WOW! I guess TRA is giving the hobbyist what THEY want :)
snipped-for-privacy@juno.com wrote:
  Quoted Text Here  

You missed the one SIAR vote.

snipped-for-privacy@juno.com wrote:
  Quoted Text Here  
And 1834 people emailed me to say your a twit.
See, I can pull numbers out of my ass too!
Interesting that the poll thread, according to google groups (which, apparently, is what you use), doesn't even have enough posts in it to account for all the NAR votes, much less the TRA ones.

ok- thanks for the poll , now crawl back into the hole

Probably more like...a meth lab.

  Quoted Text Here  
A simple statistical analysis of these numbers is enough to prove beyond any resonable degree of doubt, that they're fraudulent.
Nice try, though.

loony wrote:
<about poll results, snip>
  Quoted Text Here  
You need to post the newserver which has 102 voting replies to your poll(s); none of the servers or archives I can find has anything close to those numbers. Not even Google Groups, from which my server receives the news feed with your posts.
In actuality, its about 3 to 1 for the NAR on USENET r.m.r., with about a tenth of your numbers of voting replies.
BTW, you cannot post (fabricated) e-mail numbers to a USENET poll result. The very purpose of a USENET poll is to present public results which can be seen and verified by all.

  Quoted Text Here  
lunarlos = "liar liar pants on fire"

wrote:
  Quoted Text Here  
That was the impression I got from simply reading rmr posts as well.
  Quoted Text Here  
He did.
  Quoted Text Here  
Not TRA compatible.
Jerry

Jerry Irvine wrote:
  Quoted Text Here  
jerry, Remember..., the glue!

47.6% of all statistics people qoute are made up on the spot!
  Quoted Text Here  

  Quoted Text Here  
Not to nit pik but it's more like 47.9%
; )
Randy http://vernarockets.com /

  Quoted Text Here  
WHich only proves it's the much higher 73% that I posted earlier.

Bob Kaplow wrote:
  Quoted Text Here  
Yes, but Bob, research has shown that 23.295% of the time, you're flat out wrong, and 18.6% of the time, you're just making stuff up.
-Kevin

Kevin Trojanowski wrote:
  Quoted Text Here  
Yes, but what about the other 58.105% of Bob's time, what about that?

Dave Grayvis wrote:
  Quoted Text Here  
The results are still out on that, but there is a 2.96% probability that he spends it speculating about how to spend 13.5% of his time.
-kevin

  Quoted Text Here  
I didn't realize that you knew me THAT well...

  Quoted Text Here  
Bob, when was the last time your house was debugged? ; )
Randy http://vernarockets.com /

  Quoted Text Here  
Haven't had to do that for MANY years. Frontline is great stuff.